Free Traffic Legal Advice

Thank you for your reply.
I've just requested it and will upload it once I get it.

Hi

Can anyone provide advice or opinions on the following PCN appeal message to ensure it is clear, professional, and legally sound?

Thank you in advance

_________________________


I would first like to clarify a misunderstanding in your previous response to my initial request. In my earlier communication, I did not admit liability nor accept the validity of the charge. Rather, I simply requested an extension of the discount period due to being out of the country and unable to review the PCN in a timely manner. My intention was solely to allow myself adequate time to assess the circumstances and consider my options. At no point did I concede the contravention was valid or waive my right to appeal.

So, after considering the circumstances, I wish to challenge the validity of the PCN on legal grounds, specifically on the basis that the London Borough of Camden has failed to comply with the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 (TSRGD), making the enforcement of this restriction unlawful.
At the location where the PCN was issued, there is only a single sign placed after the junction, following the pedestrian crossing. There are no advance warning signs informing drivers of the restriction ahead. By the time the sign becomes visible, it is often impossible or unsafe for the driver to turn back, making compliance unreasonable.

The failure to provide advance signage contravenes established traffic signage guidelines:

•   "It is essential that all signing provided is necessary, clear and unambiguous, and gives its message to road users at the appropriate time. The message must be quickly and easily understood at the point it is needed; neither too soon that the information might be forgotten, nor too late for the safe performance of any necessary manoeuvre." – Traffic Signs Manual (TSM) Chapter 1, 1.3.2

•   "Signs to give advance warning of regulatory restrictions are sometimes needed;" – TSM Chapter 3, 1.6.4

•   "This is to ensure that drivers have the necessary time to respond to the warning." – TSM Chapter 4, 1.9.1

Given that no advance signage was present and the restriction only became visible after the junction, I contend that the PCN is unenforceable due to non-compliance with the statutory requirements for adequate traffic signage. The absence of appropriate warnings means that drivers were not given a reasonable opportunity to avoid committing the alleged contravention.

In light of the above, I respectfully request that the PCN be cancelled due to Camden’s failure to provide proper signage in accordance with the TSRGD 2016 and the Traffic Signs Manual guidelines.

I appreciate your time in reviewing this appeal and look forward to your prompt response.

Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]

I received the email yesterday, Feb 26.

Hi everyone,

I hope you're all doing well.

I've received two PCNs for the same location and violation code but at different times. I hadn't driven this route before or for a long time prior to this incident, so I was unaware that it had been changed to a bus-only road and unfortunately missed the sign.

Would there be any grounds to appeal both PCNs? For example, if the signage is unclear or does not provide adequate notice?

Additionally, I was out of the country and only saw the PCNs yesterday. I have already requested an extension of 14 days for the discounted rate due to my absence, and the ticket is currently on hold.

I'd appreciate any advice or guidance on how to proceed.

Thanks in advance!

P.S. The PCNs, photos, and location link are attached.

Ling to google drive with all pics: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/10z-5QG7Ry2cJqo4wRMr6sQXQHNMjYo4_?usp=sharing

Link for google maps: https://maps.app.goo.gl/cYm7UnNE41PqDBQHA

Link for Gooogle street view (farther look): https://maps.app.goo.gl/8atz5PSEAbT9DBt46

Link for Gooogle street view (Closer look): https://maps.app.goo.gl/ea3YbwsxrgV3xNzj7

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Hello,

I would appreciate your advice regarding the attached PCN.

I received this notice on my windshield for a "Code 01 - parking in a restricted street during restricted hours."

Firstly, the yellow lines on the street are severely faded, with portions almost completely erased (see attached photo). Additionally, I am unsure if the lines meet the legally required width.

Secondly, I noticed the PCN has not been signed by the issuing officer.

Could you please advise on how I might challenge this ticket?

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Link for street view: https://maps.app.goo.gl/zKpNFFeHPQxwiFev8

Link for PCN and Pic: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1_apUCh3z1hvMFraqSq8e-xvj1nl33HNH?usp=sharing

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Hi

The driver was parking the car in the estates and upon returning the the vehicle he noticed the attached notice on the window.
Please guide how to appeal it.

Thank you very much in advance for your guidance.

Google Maps link showing the place of the notice been issued: https://maps.app.goo.gl/dhGRCoZ8EUXLQbU28

Google drive link to view PCN and photos: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1YkQTNi4T26L4CV6tYl5mAqluI4GXhDJ-?usp=sharing

One more question. This van was converted (adding seats) and is considered as a bus (or minibus) (like he's not paying Congestion charge etc).
Does it means he's allowed to drive through like every school bus?

Hi
Thank you for your reply.
It seems to me that he know exactly what the sign means, as he claims he usually very careful about it (and in fact he never receive such tickets).
What makes me to assume that he could probably enter the road before the school hours, and been parked between the first and the second sign. Then when he pulled out at the closing time, he did not realize hes not allowed to drive there.

Do you think it makes sense?