1
Private parking tickets / Re: I Park Services - Sens Close Chester 26.12.2025 - 2 mins 59 seconds
« on: February 01, 2026, 12:46:23 pm »
Sounds good, thank you.
How does this read for a complaint to the car park operator?
Dear Sirs,
I am pleased to note via the IAS that you have dropped the above charge, though I am disappointed you have chosen not to contact me directly.
I wish to complain that you wrongly determined a contract was entered into between I Park Services Ltd and the driver based on both the evidence of your own site cameras and the requirements of the IPC Code of Practice.
In pursuing the charge and rejecting the initial appeal, I contend you wilfully ignored:
the evidence of your ANPR site cameras which clearly captured the driver’s actions consistent with the act of “consideration”
the requirements of the IPC Code’s Consideration Period (5.1) which states drivers have a minimum of five minutes for consideration, when you recorded time on site as being two minutes and 59 seconds, of which the time actually parked was less
Based on the above, it is clear you breached the terms of use for obtaining registered keeper data from the DVLA via KADOE. This further constitutes a breach of the GDPR regulations.
Unless you can adequately explain why you believed a contract was formed between driver and I Park Services Ltd in this instance, I will raise my complaint with the DVLA, request that you be stripped of your KADOE license and be reported to the ICO for breach of GDPR regulations.
I look forward to hearing from you.
How does this read for a complaint to the car park operator?
Dear Sirs,
I am pleased to note via the IAS that you have dropped the above charge, though I am disappointed you have chosen not to contact me directly.
I wish to complain that you wrongly determined a contract was entered into between I Park Services Ltd and the driver based on both the evidence of your own site cameras and the requirements of the IPC Code of Practice.
In pursuing the charge and rejecting the initial appeal, I contend you wilfully ignored:
the evidence of your ANPR site cameras which clearly captured the driver’s actions consistent with the act of “consideration”
the requirements of the IPC Code’s Consideration Period (5.1) which states drivers have a minimum of five minutes for consideration, when you recorded time on site as being two minutes and 59 seconds, of which the time actually parked was less
Based on the above, it is clear you breached the terms of use for obtaining registered keeper data from the DVLA via KADOE. This further constitutes a breach of the GDPR regulations.
Unless you can adequately explain why you believed a contract was formed between driver and I Park Services Ltd in this instance, I will raise my complaint with the DVLA, request that you be stripped of your KADOE license and be reported to the ICO for breach of GDPR regulations.
I look forward to hearing from you.
"Operator conceded this appeal due to mitigation", it says on the IAS appeals portal.