Show Posts - Gooner063

Hi Thanks again for the help and kindness shown.I will wait for further instruction from you Enjoy your Sunday CheersG

Wow What a mess of an outfit POPLA are, surely going forward they need looking into by somebody.I will forward that today Intercity, but they do say they will ignore any further correspondence, bet they read it though.Thanks for your time my friendCheersG

I have had the invite to pay up within 28 days and that has been ignored, I must say it came very quickly after the original decision by POPLA. So lets wait for the rest of the threatening letters to arrive.

Had the reply from the popla complaint, brilliantly put together by intercity. As expected the complaint was brushed away.https://freeimage.host/i/qeLuloJhttps://freeimage.host/i/qeLlfQ1https://freeimage.host/i/qeLGS0Fhttps://freeimage.host/i/qeLXDQ4https://freeimage.host/i/qeLkZSphttps://freeimage.host/i/qeLgC2jhttps://freeimage.host/i/qeLPd8b

Intercity I somehow pressed dislike on your post, instead of like, please dont hold that against me 

Intercity that is an amazing piece of work my friend, that must have taken so much of your precious time to do, I am already indebted to you and the other guys on the forum. This forum im addicted to, I read all the posts whether i understand them or not.Thanks again and i will now email this over to them.You have a great day, some good karma is coming your way.CheersG

HiNo need to be sorry, you have been very helpful.I find the email about the  coffee date more bizarre and their reliance on it, seems to me the subject is more interested in coffee than answering the question, seems to be added as an after thought.Strange. https://freeimage.host/i/fk0FIlpI will wait to hear more from the people.Thanks again for your time and knowledgeCheersG

Hi IntercityIm not sure I understand the comment you made my friend, could you expand a little please.ThanksG

Hi GuysJust had an email from popla who have refused my appeal, even Im frowning and thinking how did that fail, I suppose I will be getting a deluge of letters from them now about paying up, which I wont do. Ive read through many other posts and it seems I ignore them and wait for the letter of something or another, I do forget what it is called. Old age Im afraid!I have put up the decision and the popla persons name.Your continued advice would be helpful and Id be very gratefulKind regardsGhttps://freeimage.host/i/qqmefcBhttps://freeimage.host/i/qqyXUlI

Hi IntercityThank you so much for this piece of outstanding work, it seems very professional and well thought out, and is a 1000 times better than anything that I would be able to cobble together.I will send this off this morning and keep you updated on progress.Thanks again G

Thanks for looking at this intercity and i appreciate your time and the other other guys.If you could provide a defense for popla that would be outstanding, i have a few days left

Good Morning GuysSorry for the late reply, work got in the way.Thanks for spending your valuable time on this for me.I have uploaded what I think may be useful rather than all of what MET replied to the POPLA appeal.I have tried to put it into some semblance of order, but computer skills are not my forte, so bear with me.https://freeimage.host/i/fk09Il1https://freeimage.host/i/fk0FIlphttps://freeimage.host/i/fk0f4Vahttps://freeimage.host/i/fk0q1qJhttps://freeimage.host/i/fk0BNyBhttps://freeimage.host/i/fk0CyWFhttps://freeimage.host/i/fk0nm74https://freeimage.host/i/fk0xAtShttps://freeimage.host/i/fk0zGgshttps://freeimage.host/i/fk0IW6FThanks in advance for some guidance and patience G

Hi GuysHappy New Year to you all.So I received MET reply to the the popla appeal and ive cut and pasted it here, there is also an attachment with an enormous amount of of there evidence, do you need all of this as well.Regards G In the appeal to POPLA Mrs xxxxxx states that the land in question is not “relevant land” and therefore we have no lawful basis to pursue the registered keeper. Firstly, we will turn to the breach of the terms and conditions itself. In this instance, the driver was not entitled to the free parking period as the store was closed and they were therefore not a Starbucks customer. As advised on the signs, only Starbucks customers are entitled to the free parking period, and they must register their vehicle on arrival. The driver did not make payment for their stay as an alternative and as such the parking charge was issued. This would not qualify under F.3(g) of the Appeals Charter as only Starbucks customers are permitted to park for free, which the driver was not as the store was closed. As such, the appellant was not entitled to the further reduction when their appeal was declined. We note that the appellant claims that the land on which the charge was issued is not relevant land as defined under PoFA and the basis of their argument is that the land falls within the boundaries of Stansted Airport. We are also aware that they have submitted an outdated plan that remains available on the internet which they are seeking to rely on to support their argument. The plan submitted, however, was superseded and replaced when the airport sold the land in 2011. The current plan for Stansted Airport can be found on the Stansted Airport website at: https://assets.live.dxp.maginfrastructure.com/f/73114/x/a7ebfb2621/mag-sealed-amended-claim-form-updated.pdf?_gl=1*3pf4ff*_gcl_au*NzgzOTEyMzEzLjE3NTkxNjMzNDE This was used in the recent injunction against Just Stop Oil protesters. We attach a copy of that plan below that clearly excludes the highlighted area where the parking charge was issued. Map of Stansted Airport from the Stansted airport website - Area highlighted in yellow is clearly outside the boundary of the airport We also include in section E: o an extract from the title deeds and title plan that show the freehold was sold on 2 August 2011 to Grove Developments; and o correspondence received from Stansted Airport confirming that the byelaws only apply on land that is owned and in the possession of the airport. In light of this it is clear that the land is not subject to the airport byelaws and instead falls within the definition of relevant land under the terms of PoFA. Therefore, where we do not know the name and serviceable address of the driver and have complied with all pertinent conditions of Schedule 4 to PoFA we may pursue the registered keeper for payment of an outstanding charge. Please see our compliant Notice to Keeper in Section B of our evidence pack. Please also see a full explanation of why we may pursue the registered keeper under Schedule 4 of PoFA 2012 in Section C of our evidence pack. To summarise, the terms and conditions of parking are clearly stated on the signs that are prominently displayed at the entrance to and around the car park. These include that there is a 60-minute free stay for Southgate Park customers and tariffs apply thereafter. Please note: as the parking event occurred while the on-site business was closed, there is no free stay. Should the driver have wished to use the car park while the business is closed, they should have paid the appropriate tariff. As the evidence we have provided in Section E of our evidence pack demonstrates, the vehicle remained in the car park without payment having been made. It remains the driver’s responsibility to check the signs where they park and comply with the stated terms and conditions. Therefore, we believe that the charge notice was issued correctly, and the appeal should be refused.

https://freeimage.host/i/fl33qpphttps://freeimage.host/i/flFmWKvhttps://freeimage.host/i/flK9hUxhttps://freeimage.host/i/flKJBjIHi GuysAs expected the appeal was refused and they decided to waste more time and money.I have been issued the popla code and would ask kindly for some help with that please.I have become addicted to reading about other cases on this site, so have a fair amount of knowledge as how to proceed, if you guys are busy.Thanks again for your help and providing a great site to read, and some of your comments do make me laugh, you sound like the type of people id gladly have a pint with.CheersG

Thanks for the continued advise guysG