Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - 3times

Pages: [1]
1
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: January 28, 2026, 09:07:01 am »
Thanks for the reply. Looks like I missed the opportunity. Although the email from Popla came through at 11pm last night so technically still had an hour.

from Popla:

We are writing to update you about your appeal.

Your appeal is now ready to be assessed and is currently in a queue waiting to be allocated. We expect to make a decision on your appeal 6-8 weeks from the point that the appeal was first submitted. The next communication that you will receive from us will be the decision on your appeal.

2
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: January 27, 2026, 09:12:07 pm »
Just found an email from POPLA in my junk. Dated 20/01 and saying I have 7 days to provide any comments to the info that CUP have provided.

Looks like I'm missing that deadline. Anything I need to do.

details:
Your parking charge appeal against Close Unit Protection - EW.

Close Unit Protection - EW has now uploaded its evidence to your appeal. This will be available for you to view by clicking here

Please note: some evidence may not show immediately, if it is not currently available on your account please check back later before contacting us.

You have seven days from the date of this correspondence to provide comments on the evidence uploaded by Close Unit Protection - EW.

Please note that these comments must relate to the grounds of appeal you submitted when first lodging your appeal with POPLA, we do not accept new grounds of appeal or evidence at this stage

Any comments received after the period of seven days has ended will not be considered and we will progress your appeal for assessment. Therefore, if you have any issues with the evidence uploaded by Close Unit Protection - EW such as being unable to view it online, please contact POPLA immediately via phone - 0330 1596 126, or email - info@popla.co.uk, so that we can look to rectify this as soon as possible.

After this period has ended, we will aim to issue our decision as quickly as possible. The decision we reach is final and binding. When the decision is reached there is no further option for appeal.

Yours sincerely

POPLA Team

3
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: January 26, 2026, 03:07:43 pm »
I have managed to redact personal info from the doc that CUP sent

https://ibb.co/WNByf157

All help greatly appreciated.

4
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: January 20, 2026, 02:51:57 pm »
CUP have submitted their evidence to POPLA as below; There is a pack as a PDF but I don't have a way of redacting any info without printing (30 pages).

PCN Details • Parking operator: CUP Enforcement • PCN number: 116522 • VRM: TON13X • Method of issue: PoFA Notice to Keeper Postal Notice MNPR • Date of contravention: 19/11/2025 • Date notice sent: 27/11/2025 • Location: Trade City • Reason for issue: Parked on or within a no-parking area. Parking Policy: CUP Enforcement has a valid rolling contract in place with their client at the location. A copy has been included within this evidence pack, along with the site map. The site is private land and parking conditions signage is on display at the location. The parking area is monitored by wardens. Any vehicle found parked within a no-parking area be issued with a PCN. Case Summary ● The vehicle was observed parked at the site on 19/11/2025 in a no parking area; on a yellow-lined pedestrian pathway. Such areas are universally recognised as spaces where parking is not permitted. Photographic evidence was captured on the day. ● As the motorist had accepted the terms by parking their vehicle at the location, a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) was issued to the registered keeper of the vehicle by post. ● An appeal was received from the keeper on 08/12/2025 wherein the appellant’s statement confirmed he was the keeper and that he would not be naming the driver. ● No evidence was submitted to support any authority to use the no-parking area. ● As a PoFA had been issued, the keeper was confirmed, the evidence confirmed the vehicle was parked in a no parking area in view of the terms and conditions, the vehicle was parked on a yellow lined pedestrian pathway, the vehicle was not exempt from parking conditions and no evidence was submitted to support any authorisation to use the space, the appeal was rejected. • A reminder was issued on 29/12/2025. Section 19.2 of the BPA Code of Practice states that operators are required to have signage that make it clear a motorist is entering onto private land. Signs are displayed to give notice to motorists that they are entering private land and terms and conditions are in place for parking. CUP Enforcement is not required to set out individual terms for motorists’ notification. The responsibility is with the motorist when they enter the site to look for the signs detailing the full terms of parking. Additionally, there are clear floor markings at the site. Parking terms and conditions signs were on display at the location. Signage can be seen within the sample images, site map (enclosed within this evidence pack) and supporting images. The images combined with the site map show the signage was in view and in close proximity to the vehicle, and the vehicle was parked on the no-parking area, on the yellow lined pedestrian pathway markings. o Within the POPLA, the keeper submitted multiple new grounds of appeal, which we understand is not permitted at the POPLA stage as the appellant is only required to expand on the appeal points that were initially submitted at the initial appeal stage. We submit the following: o The evidence shows that adequate signage was present. o A PoFA was issued therefore the keeper is now liable for the charge as he has refused to name the driver. o The photographic evidence confirms the vehicle was parked on a yellow lined pedestrian pathway. o The area is a no-parking area, therefore parking is not permitted in the area where the vehicle was parked. o The grace period allowance is not a period of free parking, refers to parking spaces where payment has been made for use of the parking area, for a particular amount of time, or where/if parking is permitted. The location above is private land and a signposted no-parking area where no payment was made, there was no maximum parking time frame and motorists that are not exempt are not permitted to utilise the space, therefore, the grace period is not applicable in this instance. o The Private Parking Sector Single Code of Practice (SCoP) sets the standards with which parking operators that are regulated by The British Parking Organisation and The International Parking Community need to comply. Section 2.19a of SCoP sets the definition of parking as: a vehicle entering and remaining on controlled land. Section 2.19b of SCoP defines the action of being parked as: a vehicle being stationary other than in the course of driving. A vehicle may be deemed to be parked whether or not the driver has vacated the vehicle/turned off the ignition. The photographic images captured the vehicle parked for 7 minutes and 30 seconds. As parking was prohibited in this area, there was a breach of the terms and conditions indeed. Parking standards at the location are a matter of safety, security and etiquette. The motorist failed in their responsibility after they parked in a no-parking area. The regulations of parking on the site clearly state the requirements. CUP Enforcement has a written and signed agreement with the landowner giving it rightful authority to fulfil their duty in carrying out enforcement on this land. All CUP enforcement on the site is in full compliance with BPA parking regulations. The parking charge amount was £100, reduced to £60 if payment was made within 14 days, and held at that amount after the appeal response. No payment has been received. The charge now stands at £100. When parking on private land, the contract formed is between the motorist and the parking operator. It is the responsibility of the motorist to ensure they have sought out, read and complied with the parking operator’s terms and conditions, which are stated on the signage if they want to use land that does not belong to them. As can be seen from the images and the site map provided in this evidence pack, the signboards and yellow lined areas are clear, legible and in prominent positions. The motorist had the opportunity to observe the terms. As a PoFA was issued; the keeper has been confirmed; utility of the site was gained; the vehicle was parked on private land in a no-parking area, adequate signage, floor markings and parking terms were on display; the vehicle was not exempt; and no evidence to support authorisation to use the no parking area was submitted; we stand by the decision to issue the PCN and request the refusal of the appeal. Please see the uploaded items for the operator images and the evidence pack complete with supporting documents.

5
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: January 02, 2026, 11:17:33 am »
@b789

If the signs communicated an offer of a right to park in a marked bay in return for some consideration from the driver, and included a prohibition on parking outside of marked bays, all things being equal, that would be a valid contractual offer. The point is that no such offer is communicated in any meaningful sense to any class of person who was not a permit holder (and presumably not to permit holders either)

You appear to be arguing that any breach defeats any offer, because the relevant clause was itself prohibitive. That would be very inaccurate.

The fact that the signs clearly prohibit parking on the walkway does not make them entirely prohibitive - it is the fact that no offer is communicated to the class of which the driver was a member which means that there was no offer (and that the signs were entirely prohibitive).

@OP - are there any other signs purporting to offer any right to park within the car park, and particularly at the entrance?

The only signs are the ones I originally posted.

As an aside I emailed the company that was being visited to see if they could do anything, even stating that a competitor would be used in future if the parking conditions continued. They said they couldn't do anything.

6
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: December 31, 2025, 10:46:44 am »
Many thanks. POPLA appeal submitted.

7
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: December 30, 2025, 02:20:30 pm »
Appeal declined as expected and popla code issued. Appeal is dated 11/12, went to junk so only just found it.

This is the text of the appeal letter they sent;
Site: Trade city
Issue date: 27/11/2025
Contravention: Parked on or within a no parking area
Thank you for your appeal received on 08/12/2025 regarding the above detailed Parking Charge Notice. We have reviewed the case and considered the comments you have made. This appeal has been considered in conjunction with the evidence gathered by the parking attendant. Our records show the notice was correctly issued as the vehicle was parked in breach of the Terms and Conditions of Parking.
Whilst we appreciate your concerns and the comments raised; the vehicle was parked on private land, in a no parking area, on a yellow-lined pedestrian walkway, in breach of the terms and conditions, the vehicle registration mark was not exempt from parking terms neither was it registered at the above location, and no supporting evidence was submitted in the first instance to support authority from the operator to use the space.
Within the appeal, you claimed that the Notice to Keeper does not comply with the requirements of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.
The notice states:
' ... This Parking Charge Notice has been issued to the above-mentioned vehicle due to a breach of the Terms & Conditions of Parking at the location noted above. The Parking Charge is now payable to C.U.P Enforcement as the Creditor. The Parking Charge notice of £100 is due for payment within 28 days of the notice date. If paid within 14 days of this notice date the amount payable will be reduced to £60.
The signage displayed at the entrance of the car park and throughout states that the site is private land operated by C.U.P Enforcement (the creditor). The conditions detailed on the signage must be complied to or a Parking Charge Notice will be incurred. Motorists who choose to park their vehicle in the car park are thereby agreeing to be bound by these terms. As the motorist has contravened the terms and conditions detailed on the signage, a parking charge notice has been issued and is now payable to C.U.P Enforcement.
Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Paragraph:
You are notified under paragraph 9(2)(b) of schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 that the driver of the vehicle is required to pay this parking charge in full. If you were not the driver of the vehicle at the time, please inform us of the name and current postal address of the driver and pass this notice on to them. This information can be supplied online at: cupenforcement-liability.zatappeal.com You are advised that if, after 29 days from the date given (which is presumed to be the second working day after the Date Issued), the parking charge has not been paid in full and we do not know both the name and current address of the driver, we have the right to recover any unpaid part of the parking charge from you as the vehicles Registered Keeper. This Notice is given to you under Paragraph 9(2)(f) of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 and is subject to our compliance with the applicable conditions under Schedule 4 of the Act.
Should you provide an incorrect address for service, we may pursue you for any Parking Charge amount that remains unpaid. Should you identify someone who denies they were the driver, we may pursue you for any Parking Charge amount that remains unpaid. Please see reverse for details of how to pay, transfer liability, or appeal this PCN ... ' CUP Enforcement is authorised to issue clearance, parking permits and charges under PoFA 2012 in cases of contravention. As detailed above, the notice is PoFA 2012 compliant, and as the keeper you are now liable for the
charge.
The driver entered a contract with CUP due to the following: Firstly, there was an offer, which was reasonably brought to attention via signage at the site which sets out the terms and conditions. Secondly, the driver was afforded a reasonable opportunity to read and understand the offer and consequently, is now required to comply with the contract. Ultimately, it is the responsibility and duty of the motorist to ensure upon arrival, that they seek out, read and comply with terms and conditions accepted upon parking if they wish to use land that does not belong to them. By parking the vehicle in contravention, they accept the potential consequence of incurring a PCN. Terms and conditions were undoubtedly displayed and contact information is displayed on all CUP signage,
however, none was made. Unfortunately, sufficient evidence was not provided in order to warrant the cancellation of the PCN. As the contact details of the driver have not been provided, the registered keeper is now liable for the parking charge notice. The terms and conditions are displayed on CUP signage throughout the development to notify drivers of the contractual agreement when entering the above location. We can confirm the officer followed the correct procedure and the PCN was issued correctly.
Please note that the grace period allowance is not a period of free parking, refers to parking spaces where payment has been made for use of the parking area, for a particular amount of time, or where/if parking is permitted. The location above is private land hence it is a restricted area where no payment was made, there was no maximum parking time frame and motorists that are not exempt are not permitted to utilise the parking spaces, therefore, the grace period is not applicable in this instance.
The Private Parking Sector Single Code of Practice (SCoP) sets the standards with which parking operators that are regulated by The British Parking Organisation and The International Parking Community need to comply.
Section 2.19a of SCoP sets the definition of parking as: a vehicle entering and remaining on controlled land.
Section 2.19b of SCoP defines the action of being parked as: a vehicle being stationary other than in the course of driving. A vehicle may be deemed to be parked whether or not the driver has vacated the vehicle/turned off the ignition. The evidence shows it was stationary; hence, was observed as being parked - this observation stands.
As parking was prohibited in this area, there was a breach of the terms and conditions indeed.
A stationary vehicle is classed as parked whether or not the driver or any passengers are waiting within the vehicle or in the surrounding area, and whether or not the engine is running. Parking standards are a matter of safety, security and etiquette. Responsibility rests with the driver to ensure the area selected for stay, no matter the occasion or duration, is suitable and parking complies with current terms and conditions. The time and date stamped photographic evidence submitted by the operative, captured the vehicle parked at the location. Our sitemaps confirm the signage at the site was clear, legible, unobstructed, in full operation and in proximity to the
vehicle.


What is my next move. Thanks

8
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: December 08, 2025, 11:09:48 am »
I have managed to appeal direct on their site. Thanks for help so far.

9
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: December 08, 2025, 10:45:54 am »
Just tried to submit the appeal via the link in the email and it directs me to the same site as CUP which doesn't recognise the details and tells me to email the same address which generates the same auto reply as before.

Not quite sure where to go now.

10
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: December 04, 2025, 04:13:37 pm »
The PCN says to appeal at cupenforcement.zatappeal.com.

When I put in my details it says they are not recognised and to email info@alliance-parking.co.uk. I did this and the reply was as above.

11
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: December 04, 2025, 02:42:31 pm »
Just emailed the address given on appeals link and have received the following automated response. Seems they can't even get the correct details on the PCN on how to appeal.Should I appeal to the link in the reply.

"PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING IMPORTANT INFORMATION

This email address often receives emails that cannot/will not be handled by the department that monitors this account; therefore, not all emails submitted to this inbox will be responded to.

If the reason for your email is listed below, please refer to the relevant section for more information:

Parking Charge appeals
Chasing Appeal Response
Debt Recovery / Solicitor letter queries
Retrospective payment for parking requests
Registration number amendment requests
Hire/Lease company liability transfers

PARKING CHARGE APPEALS

If you are requesting a Parking Charge to be disputed, cancelled, reviewed, or adjusted in any manner (whether before or after issuance), this will be considered an APPEAL (not available to hire or lease companies – see below).

Due to the high volume of emails we receive, some may be overlooked. Therefore, to prevent any negative consequences for motorists, we do not handle appeals submitted by email, nor will we respond to post-appeal rejection emails.

We have a dedicated online portal that efficiently tracks every step of the appeal process; therefore, appeals must be submitted through our online portal here: www.alliance-parking.co.uk/appeals. Note: You cannot appeal a charge that is with Debt Recovery; the deadline for doing so has elapsed by this stage.

To reiterate, appeals/challenges submitted to this email address will not be responded to.

CHASING APPEAL RESPONSE

As detailed in the Notice to Keeper: "We endeavour to respond to appeals within 28 days of receipt. During this time, the sum of the charge will be placed on hold and will apply for a further 14 days after we have responded."

Pre-mature requests (submitted before 28 days have elapsed) for an appeal response/update will not be responded to.

DEBT RECOVERY / SOLICITOR LETTER QUERIES

If you have received a letter, text or call from our Debt Recovery agents or appointed solicitors, any correspondence must now be submitted to them, who will have provided you with their contact details.

These organisations have full access to our records; therefore, can assist with any enquiry that you may have.

To reiterate, emails submitted to this inbox from motorists following receipt of contact from our Debt Recovery agents / Solicitors will not be responded to.

RETROSPECTIVE PAYMENT FOR PARKING/REGISTRATION NUMBER AMENDMENT REQUESTS

Payment must be made immediately upon arrival, ensuring you enter your full and correct registration details. If you could not pay for parking, you should not have parked. As such, requests of this nature will not receive a response. If you receive a Parking Charge, you will have the opportunity to submit an appeal.

HIRE/LEASE COMPANY LIABILITY TRANSFERS

Hire/Lease companies cannot transfer liability electronically; therefore, emails of this nature will not be responded to. For more information, please refer to section 13 of The Protection of Freedoms Act.

We will endeavour to respond to all other enquiries within 5 working days.

Administration Department

Disclaimer: This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. Please note that neither Alliance Parking nor the sender accepts any responsibility for viruses, and it is your responsibility to scan any attachments. Alliance Parking UK Ltd is registered in England and Wales with company number 09766749."

12
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: December 02, 2025, 07:12:51 pm »
How very strange that the appeals process does not recognise my details and asks me to email them.

13
Private parking tickets / Re: CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: December 02, 2025, 07:09:34 pm »
Thanks, will get the appeal done.

14
Private parking tickets / CUP Enforcement. Trade City, Romford
« on: December 01, 2025, 09:42:59 am »
Driver was collecting from one of the units of the estate. There were no parking spaces outside of the unit so driver parked on what is designated a 'walkway' Collecting heavy object so wanted to be as close as possible. Driver has parked here in the past with no issues and di not notice the signs when entering & parking.
Called the company who driver was collecting from and they say cannpt do anything, and have actually had there own drivers ticketed when they were waiting to get into a space.
PCN was recieved on 28/11.

https://ibb.co/gbQvysRL
https://ibb.co/Pv16PX4w
https://ibb.co/xKHbhy91
https://ibb.co/ymMb7P6x
https://ibb.co/b5JGJ93X
https://ibb.co/B2KsBcH0

Any help appreciated but if nothing can be done accecpt it (begrudginly).

Pages: [1]