Morning all

We've had an email response from IAS on Thursday 26th Feb so are posting it here for collective thoughts on what the next step is? but please hold your tummy's and bladder's whilst reading as it made laugh uncontrollably.

Think we're now about to embark on the "threatening bailiff and fake CCJ" stage?
Appeal Outcome: Dismissed
The Adjudicators comments are as follows:
"The Appellant should understand that the Adjudicator is not in a position to give legal advice to either of the parties but they are entitled to seek their own independent legal advice. The Adjudicator's role is to consider whether or not the parking charge has a basis in law and was properly issued in the circumstances of each individual case.
In all Appeals the Adjudicator is bound by the relevant law applicable at the time and is only able to consider legal challenges and not factual mistakes nor extenuating or mitigating circumstances. Throughout this appeal the Operator has had the opportunity consider all points raised and could have conceded the appeal at any stage. The Adjudicator who deals with this Appeal is legally qualified and each case is dealt with according to their understanding of the law as it applies and the legal principles involved. A decision by an Adjudicator is not legally binding on an Appellant who is entitled to seek their own legal advice if they so wish.
The Appellant's vehicle has been recorded as parking on private land where the signage clearly states that parking must be in a marked bay. The Appellant's vehicle is parked on double yellow lines outside of a marked bay.
The Notice to Keeper is POFA compliant and gives all the relevant details required and is served within the required time frame. The Appellant is being held liable as the keeper.
There is a consideration period allowed for motorists to read the signage and decide if they are able to comply with the terms, but once the driver leaves the vehicle and makes use of the site that consideration period ends as the driver is deemed to have accepted the terms.
Having considered all the relevant issues raised and the evidence submitted, I am satisfied that the Appellant should have seen the prominent signage, the Appellant chose to ignore the terms, and the operator has established that the Parking Charge was properly issued.
This appeal therefore has to be dismissed. "
As your appeal has been dismissed, the Independent Adjudicator has found, upon the evidence provided, that the parking charge was lawfully incurred.
As this appeal has not been resolved in your favour, the IAS is unable to intervene further in this matter.
You should contact the operator within 28 days to make payment of the charge.
Should you continue to contest the charge then you should consider obtaining independent legal advice.
Yours sincerely,
The Independent Appeals Service
Independent Appeals Service
PO Box 662, Macclesfield, SK10 9NR
w:
www.theias.org