Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - lmags

Pages: [1]
1
If you can please help me with my tribunal appeal I would be very grateful

2
Hi,
See all PCN received in here:

https://imgpile.com/p/qPXC6UD

So you are saying that I can dispute these?
Should I put in a further appeal using the grounds: That the PCN(s) are invalid because they fail to particularise which vehicles i.e. motor vehicles
Should I add any more detail, able you able to give me reference to the case you won?

Assistance in anything moving forward I would be massively grateful. £80 x 4 is a ridiculous amount to be fined.

4
I would like someone to please assist me in my appeal to these tickets. I have received four of the same ticket for the contravention outlined in the subject above. I have been using this route for years then a sign has been put up, that I didn't notice, probably due to habit of driving the same route for years, stating certain vehicles cant go down it.

I initially appealed the tickets using this:
"Formal Appeal: PCNs MT01838156, MT01906201, MT0194314A, MT01944867 Vehicle Reg: KM73NKR.
I appeal these four PCNs (Code 52J, LTN - Abbey Road). Repeated charges confirm systemic clarity failure.
Ground 1: Procedural Impropriety. The PCN is invalid. See section 4(8)(b) of the LLA & TFL Act 2003 mandates the PCN "specify the form" for representations. The PCN fails this requirement, which constitutes a legal ground for cancellation. Ground 2: Inadequate Signage. Location has severe information overload: a dense cluster of conflicting signs (width limit, controlled zone, speed limit, parking) as well as being near 7ft restrictions. This is ambiguous as vehicle complies with width restriction, distracting environment prevents reliable restriction identification.
I demand immediate cancellation of all four PCNs. If rejected, provide a Notice of Rejection and full documentation to appeal to the Traffic Adjudicator."


See my initial appeal and their reply and the evidence.
https://imgpile.com/p/7Ofrb8X


Thanks in advance

Pages: [1]