Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Patmoore

Pages: [1] 2
1
WOW, Seriously, is that an actual record of a hearing?

2
I most certainly will do!

3
I do fully intend to go to court if neccesary! - Thank you SO much yet again for your back up and reassurance!

4
Hi - I have now just received this from Elms Legal!!!! It looks as if I will be going to court?

https://ibb.co/fGYgF0F0

5
Hi,

I have received the reply from Elms Legal regarding the email I sent them on the 15th December. They seem determined to do the course?

https://imgbox.com/juKdhx1I
https://imgbox.com/KTkoi2O9
https://imgbox.com/ii3rM9yt

6
Dear Hero Member,

Thankn you SO much, I really appreciate the help and support. A very tidy and professional response.

7
I have just received an email from Elms Legal. I have also uploaded the email as well as some correspondence whhich they have replied to in this email. I m afraid the upload is in the wrong order!  Thank you for your continued help! https://imgpile.com/p/DJzT3lD

8
Ok - Thank you, Can you advise as to how to construct the complaint to the CMA please? Thanks.

9
Wow, Thank you very much. I will do just that. - Should I actually follow up and complain to the CMA too?

10
After having received an LBC and replied back still dipsuting but adding that the letter was not compliant (which it wasn't).

(It is disappointing to note that your letter fails to meet the requirements set out in paragraphs 3.1(a)–(d), 5.1, and 5.2 of the Protocol, as well as paragraphs 6(a) and 6(c) of the Practice Direction. These provisions are not optional; they exist to facilitate informed engagement and proportionate resolution prior to litigation. I encourage you to review them carefully.

The Civil Procedure Rules 1998, Part 3, Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols, require that parties exchange sufficient information to understand each other’s position before proceedings are issued. Paragraph 6 of the Practice Direction clarifies that this includes disclosure of key documents relevant to the dispute. Your letter refers to a “contract” yet fails to provide one—undermining the very basis of your client’s claim and obstructing meaningful pre-litigation dialogue.

I also note that your Letter Before Claim fails to enclose the required Reply Form and Information Sheet, as stipulated under paragraph 3.1(a) of the Protocol. Providing only a hyperlink to these documents does not satisfy the requirement to include them with the letter itself. This omission impedes my ability to respond meaningfully and constitutes a procedural defect. I request that you remedy this by supplying the required documents before any further action is taken.)

They had set a hold date of the 13th Nov. I have heard nothing until today. This seems to be a backward move in the process? Any thoughts please? I received a letter from ELMS Legal https://ibb.co/DDPPNfKm

11
 b789

    Hero Member

Thank you SO much for your ongoing interest and help in this case ! I will let you know the outcome in due course? Regards!

12
Hi - I responded by post, with a certificate of posting as well as email!

14
I am unsure as to whether the laast post contained my reply so I have added it in here!

https://imgur.com/a/Qy5sC3a

15
Thank you for your help! I have uploaded the LoC and my response to it?????

https://imgur.com/UfTio69

Pages: [1] 2