Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Trousers37

Pages: [1]
1
Thanks again will see what they come back with!

2
Thanks appreciate it

So specifically cite the link you referenced before. And say about the £20?

Would you attach the RingGo receipt or not?

Thanks so much again!

3
Just giving this a bump

Would the proposed reply be ok?

Thanks

4
Sorry, always getting a bit paranoid with these things.

“I am appealing this charge as the registered keeper of the vehicle.

Attached is a VAT receipt for payment at the Burton Road car park completed using the RingGO app. This payment was for £5.20 to cover all day parking at the Burton Road Car Park.  However, the RingGo app defaulted to a the registration of a different car previously owned by the driver.

Therefore I appeal this charge as it represents a keying error and you have received appropriate payment for parking to cover the stated vehicle and its time of stay.

Please let me know if you require further documents to evidence payment of the parking.

Thanks”

Planned to attach RingGo VAT Receipt, which doesn’t name anyone, but does include a customer ID which could be traceable.

Thanks
Would the above suffice?

5
Great thank you.

Will see how we get on.

6
Thanks

Any advice on how best to respond? Should keep provider full evidence at this point?

Thanks

7
Registered keeper received PCN from good value parking dated 8th October for parking on 6th October at burton Road, Lichfield

Payment was made for all day parking of the registered vehicles car on Ring Go app.

Payment had defaulted on app to vehicle reg of a car no longer owned by registered keeper rather than the registration of the vehicle that has received the PCN.

Attached below PCN and parking charges.

Any advice appreciated

Thanks


https://ibb.co/Z6cZ6tvh
https://ibb.co/gLGwkVwL
https://ibb.co/xkssccX

8
Great thank you.

9
Hi

Assume no issue in responding to Moorside with vehicle reg and address to pass their security checks so can understand what response they would like to send?

Thanks

10
Thanks

See links attached for Letter of Claim received in June. Recommended response sent to Moorside 12 days after date of letter by email.

Thanks again for your continued help. Appreciate any guidance on next steps.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ur8P0Y22PKhNOft9sfKMBQ_7ajyvxcOu/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1drNv08OPgtyeWxXw4emml6sqFNOfnYYx/view?usp=drivesdk

11
Correct. That’s what they have responded with.

No correspondence received in the post. This is first point of contact received after sending the detailed reply as recommended.

The email is a reply to that response sent to Moorside by email. And simply says

“ Thank you for your email.
To enable us to process your email, we need to confirm that we are corresponding with the correct individual. To pass our security checks, we ask that you confirm the following: 
Address and post code
Vehicle registration
Please reply to this email to continue the email thread. 
Yours sincerely
Moorside Legal”

12
Hi

Keeper of vehicle received an email from Moorside asking:

“To enable us to process your email, we need to confirm that we are corresponding with the correct individual. To pass our security checks, we ask that you confirm the following: 
Address and post code
Vehicle registration
Please reply to this email to continue the email thread.”

Assume no issue for the keeper to provide this information?

Thanks

13
Thanks appreciate that

Just for my clarification, the letter of claims asks for £170. In the suggested response above:

“ 12. Am I to understand that the additional £70 represents what is dressed up as a 'Debt Recovery' fee, and if so, is this nett or inclusive of VAT? If the latter, would you kindly explain why I am being asked to pay the operator’s VAT?”

Is the additional £70 a standard uplift that is applied to Alliance’s PCN notice? (Sorry don’t have original letters to hand at the moment as away)

Thanks

14
Thanks so much for the advice.

Will send across today.

Out of interest - what are the likely next steps after this?

15
Seeking support in relation to the below matter.

Last year keeper of vehicle received a PCN from Alliance Parking at Trevino beach. Parking was paid by non keeper of car and can be evidenced on bank statement. There was a delay returning to the car resulting in an overstay of 10/20 mins (exact time not known as purchased ticket not kept)

Keeper did not take picture of parking signs but found this picture online (also see attached)

https://www.searchforsites.co.uk/image.php?src=24897_1632245139_app.jpg

The keeper appealed the PCN as follows:

I dispute your 'parking charge', as the keeper of the vehicle. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner.

There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn. Since your PCN is a vague template, I require an explanation of the allegation and your evidence. You must include a close up actual photograph of the sign you contend was at the location on the material date as well as your images of the vehicle.

If the allegation concerns a PDT machine, the data supplied in response to this appeal must include the record of payments made - showing partial VRNs - and an explanation of the reason for the PCN, because your Notice does not explain it.

If the allegation involves an alleged overstay of minutes, your evidence must include the actual grace period agreed by the landowner.”



The keeper received letters from Trace and more recently Moorside legal chasing payment but they have been ignored.

Last week a letter of claim was received from moorside, dated 18 June.

Any advice on how to respond would be much appreciated

Thanks


 



[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Pages: [1]