1
Private parking tickets / Re: Airport drop off
« on: June 12, 2025, 05:10:06 pm »
No Clear Statement That They Are Relying on POFA
POFA Schedule 4, paragraph 9(2)(f) requires a specific statement:
“the creditor has the right to recover from the keeper so much of the unpaid parking charges as remain unpaid...”
APCOA’s PCN does not include this wording. Instead, it says:
“We invite you, the Registered Keeper, to pay...”
This wording is non-binding and fails to establish keeper liability under POFA.
also, No Mention of “Period of Parking”
POFA 9(2)(a) requires the PCN to “specify the period of parking to which the notice relates”.
Your PCN only gives entry and exit timestamps (ANPR capture). This refers to total time on site, not a clearly defined "period of parking".
POFA case law (such as POPLA appeals and ICO guidance) confirms that entry/exit times alone don’t satisfy the requirement for a defined parking period.
also2, Wording Implies Driver Liability Only
The “USEFUL INFORMATION” section says:
“As we do not know either the name of the driver or their current address, we invite you...”
And:
“Please note making payment... is accepting liability.”
This again undermines POFA compliance. Under POFA, if they wish to pursue the keeper, they must do so unambiguously and legally — not with invitations or requests.
also3, Lack of Mandatory POFA Warning About 28-Day Liability
POFA 9(2)(f) also mandates a warning that if the keeper does not provide driver details within 28 days, they may be held liable.
This PCN does not include that statutory warning.
POFA Schedule 4, paragraph 9(2)(f) requires a specific statement:
“the creditor has the right to recover from the keeper so much of the unpaid parking charges as remain unpaid...”
APCOA’s PCN does not include this wording. Instead, it says:
“We invite you, the Registered Keeper, to pay...”
This wording is non-binding and fails to establish keeper liability under POFA.
also, No Mention of “Period of Parking”
POFA 9(2)(a) requires the PCN to “specify the period of parking to which the notice relates”.
Your PCN only gives entry and exit timestamps (ANPR capture). This refers to total time on site, not a clearly defined "period of parking".
POFA case law (such as POPLA appeals and ICO guidance) confirms that entry/exit times alone don’t satisfy the requirement for a defined parking period.
also2, Wording Implies Driver Liability Only
The “USEFUL INFORMATION” section says:
“As we do not know either the name of the driver or their current address, we invite you...”
And:
“Please note making payment... is accepting liability.”
This again undermines POFA compliance. Under POFA, if they wish to pursue the keeper, they must do so unambiguously and legally — not with invitations or requests.
also3, Lack of Mandatory POFA Warning About 28-Day Liability
POFA 9(2)(f) also mandates a warning that if the keeper does not provide driver details within 28 days, they may be held liable.
This PCN does not include that statutory warning.