Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - LondonLady

Pages: [1]
1
Got a step 2 reply, the DVLA just wiping their hands;
PAGE 1


PAGE 2


But they did apologise for the delay  :)

2
Done. Thank you.

3
Hello,

I received a reply from the DVLA, doesn't sound of any use;  :'(

PAGE 1:


PAGE 2:

4
DRP and any other debt recovery company are powerless to actually do anything and can be safely ignored. Any deadlines they mention are irrelevant.

Never, ever enter int communication with a useless and powerless debt collector. All they can do is try to persuade the low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree to pay up out of ignorance and fear. Ignore them. We don't need to know about their useless letters. Shred them and use them as hamster bedding if necessary.

So... just ignore that letter and any others you receive from DRP or any other debt collector.
Thank you for making me chuckle  ;D - no hamster and I will ignore further but post back should something different arrive.

5
Interesting that they have a different timestamp for their latest letter. I think it is time to set the DVLA on to them.

Here’s how to make a DVLA complaint:

• Go to: https://contact.dvla.gov.uk/complaints
• Select: “Making a complaint or compliment about the Vehicles service you have received”
• Enter your personal details, contact details, and vehicle details
• Use the text box to summarise your complaint or insert a covering note
• You will then be able to upload a file (up to 19.5 MB) — this can be your full complaint or supporting evidence
That’s it.
...

I've done that and Thank you for your detailled instructions.

Yesterday I received a letter from 'Debt Recovery Plus' dated 13/05/2025 stating I need to pay by 27/05/2025;

Page 1;


Page 2;



Please what do I need to do with/reply to this? The 27th is just 5 days away now.

Thank you.

6
Even if this were to ever escalate into a court claim, I seriously doubt it would ever reach a hearing. Even if it ever did, it is nothing other than be fearful of. Far too many people have little understanding of the civil court system (as opposed to the criminal system). The County Court is the ultimate dispute resolution service.

I have an update.
So the sign about 'loading/unloading' parking has been put back up but now it says it is just for 15 minutes;


I managed to ask the caretaker about this and he said that after our initial conversation about this bay, he contacted UKCPM about it and they told him that its incorrect and they would get back to him. So he took the sign down.
Now UKCPM have got back to him stating it should just be 15 minutes for loading/unloading in this bay outside my block and therefore the new sign.
He also said the Neighborhood Officer thinks it should still be 30 minutes but until he agrees something the 15mins sign stays.

Today I received a UKCPM 'FINAL CHANCE BEFORE ACTION' letter dated 25th April 2025;
Page 1


Page 2



There is now an 'issued time' of 12:03 in the 'Parking Charge Details' box on the letter which wasn't on the first letter - I don't know if this is relevant or not.
Shouldn't the issued date be the same as the date on the pictures they are showing on the letters?

Can you advise if I should do anything now?

7
OP, let's clear up some issues pl:

Is the Notice to Keeper addressed to you by name;
** The 'Penalty charge notice' is addressed to me at my home next to the 'loading/unloading bay' in the photo which the driver parked in.

It refers to 'your vehicle', not one belonging to a third party, the 'driver'. Pl explain;
** What do you mean by third party?
Yes, I am the registered keeper/owner and I let the driver use it as they help me with various things.

Was the car displaying a permit?
** No it doesn't have a permit as it isn't parked on the estate.

8
Even
than

Also, gather evidence:

• Take a photo of any “30 minutes free parking” sign to show UKCPM’s own signage contradicts their claim;
• Speak to the caretaker, as planned, to confirm the history and intended use of the drop-off bays.

You have every right to challenge this. Your lease comes first, and neither UKCPM nor Hyde can rewrite it without following proper legal procedures.
Hello,

1. There is 1 other of these "drop off bay" on the housing estate but there are no signs near it about its use.
On a nearby wall there is the sign below which looks like a parking sign I remember seeing on a street;



2. I spoke with the caretaker and he doesn't remember when the '30 mins loading/unloading' thing started or what the current status is. To be fair he has been off with medical issues so not up to speed with all changes.
He thinks it was introduced when the last parking firm Wing was here and it was something the Property Manager introduced when the PM manager existed.
Now there is something called a neighbourhood officer and he said he will ask when he sees them.


3. Today I notice the '30 min unloading' sign has dissapeared from the notice board;


I will ask the caretaker for an update when I see him.

9
...Also, gather evidence:

• Take a photo of any “30 minutes free parking” sign to show UKCPM’s own signage contradicts their claim;
• Speak to the caretaker, as planned, to confirm the history and intended use of the drop-off bays.

You have every right to challenge this. Your lease comes first, and neither UKCPM nor Hyde can rewrite it without following proper legal procedures.
Thank you, that's reassured me.

Previously there was a company called Wing doing parking on the estate and I think they went back to when clamping was still allowed.

I will ask some other residents I know what their leases say and if there have been any amendments as they are on top of all things landlord.

I will gather evidence & speak to the caretaker and report back.

Thanks you  :)

10
Quote
top photo says 21:32:46 and bottom photo says 21:42:50.
They are both 21:32, as far as I can see, suggesting they were taken just 4 seconds apart.

If you log onto the PCM online portal, are any other photos available? If so, what time stamps do these show?

There is persuasive case law on this point - if the only photos they have are taken 4 seconds apart, then as b789 says they have not stated the period of parking (required for keeper liability), but further, more basically, their evidence would not seem to show that any alleged contract has been breached if they only have 2 photos taken 4 seconds apart.

Quote
Would it be the keeper/driver or both that would need to go to the court case?
Quote
The keeper unless you identify the driver (doing so would mean PCM pursue them instead) - doing this would reduce the number of defence arguments to be made, as they couldn't use the arguments around keeper liability, but there would still seem to be a defence there.
Thank you for your reply.

The only place I see to login is to 'pay a charge' which takes me to www.paymyticket.co.uk and for my details there are 10 pictures with the following date/times; (duplicates)

2025-04-06 21:32:46 (front of car - bit fuzzy)
2025-04-06 21:33:12 (left rear of car)
2025-04-06 21:33:18 (dash through windscreen)
2025-04-06 21:36:42 (picture of CPM sign on a property away from where the car was parked - there are 2 signs within 10m of that bay)
2025-04-06 21:32:50 (like pic 1)
2025-04-06 21:32:51 (like pic 1)
2025-04-06 21:32:52 (like pic 1 - clear)
2025-04-06 21:32:53 (like pic 1)
2025-04-06 21:33:09 (left rear of car - fuzzy)
2025-04-06 21:33:10 (left rear of car)

Earliest car pic time: 2025-04-06 21:32:46 (front of car - bit fuzzy)
Latest car pic time: 2025-04-06 21:33:18 (dash through windscreen)
Latest pic time: 2025-04-06 21:36:42 (picture of CPM sign on a property away from car location)

Car observed for total of: 32 seconds (21:33:18 - 21:32:46)

Do you need to see the pictures?

11
No contract was formed as the Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not state a period of parking which also means that the Keeper cannot be liable for the charge as long as the drivers identity is revealed, inadvertently or otherwise.

Additionally, you have shown the sign that states that 30 minutes is allowed for loading and unloading. That contradicts anything in the contractual signs.

As the driver was visiting/loading/unloading you, the tenant/leaseholder, what does your lease/tenancy agreement say about parking and displaying permits? What it doesn't say about parking is equally important.

This can be fought all the way to court if necessary. However, I suggest you approach "Hyde" who I presume are something to do with the landlord or management company, as it is likely they are the party who have contracted CPM and can get the PCN cancelled. That is known as Plan A.

Any appeals are going to be unsuccessful which is why, if Plan A does not work, it will end up as a court claim.
Thank you for your reply and reassurance.

On the estate there are a couple of those 'drop off' bays and I think any nearby noticeboards have that 30 minute parking sign.

All my tenancy agreement says about parking is not to park 'indiscriminately' so as to cause a nuisance, cause obstruction, use the estate roads for repairs or park un-taxed/roadworthy vehicles;


Hyde Housing is the landowner/landlord and apparently they contracted UKCPM for free, to manage the estate parking and they keep parking permit revenues in return for a 'donation' to Hyde who operate as a not-for-profit outfit (hardly true).
Only problem with approaching Hyde is that they specialise in incompetence and I know the sequence will be something like; what sign allowing 30 mins parking? - send them the picture - response we're not aware of that - after weeks of chasing them they'll just either say; that doesn't exist, whoever arranged/agreed that has left or it's been changed and should have been removed.
I will approach the caretaker who has been here for years and ask about it - fingers crossed for Plan A.

While I feel this very wrong the thought of court makes me anxious as I'm not in the best in healthy/mobile. Would it be the keeper/driver or both that would need to go to the court case?

Thanks




12
Hello,

Hope you are all ok.

Today I received a Parking Charge Notice from UKCPM with reason "No Parking Outside Of A Designated Area" for the housing estate where I live.


The driver came to visit me and drop off some food and parked in the marked 'Drop Off Zone' bay outside my home.
The housing association has a sign up stating "30 minutes parking for loading and unloading only".
I don't remember how long the driver spent inside my home.

I am the registered keeper.

1. The Parking Charge Letter;
Page 1


There are 3 different times; letter says 21:59, top photo says 21:32:46 and bottom photo says 21:42:50.

Page 2


2. The 'Drop Off Zone' outside my home the driver parked in;


3. Housing Association notice for 'loading/unloading';


4. CPM Housing Estate Signage;



Any advice/help against this would be great.

Thank you.

Pages: [1]