1
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
DRP and any other debt recovery company are powerless to actually do anything and can be safely ignored. Any deadlines they mention are irrelevant.Thank you for making me chuckle
Never, ever enter int communication with a useless and powerless debt collector. All they can do is try to persuade the low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree to pay up out of ignorance and fear. Ignore them. We don't need to know about their useless letters. Shred them and use them as hamster bedding if necessary.
So... just ignore that letter and any others you receive from DRP or any other debt collector.
- no hamster and I will ignore further but post back should something different arrive.
Interesting that they have a different timestamp for their latest letter. I think it is time to set the DVLA on to them.
Here’s how to make a DVLA complaint:• Go to: https://contact.dvla.gov.uk/complaints...
• Select: “Making a complaint or compliment about the Vehicles service you have received”
• Enter your personal details, contact details, and vehicle details
• Use the text box to summarise your complaint or insert a covering note
• You will then be able to upload a file (up to 19.5 MB) — this can be your full complaint or supporting evidence
That’s it.


Even if this were to ever escalate into a court claim, I seriously doubt it would ever reach a hearing. Even if it ever did, it is nothing other than be fearful of. Far too many people have little understanding of the civil court system (as opposed to the criminal system). The County Court is the ultimate dispute resolution service.



OP, let's clear up some issues pl:
Is the Notice to Keeper addressed to you by name;
** The 'Penalty charge notice' is addressed to me at my home next to the 'loading/unloading bay' in the photo which the driver parked in.
It refers to 'your vehicle', not one belonging to a third party, the 'driver'. Pl explain;
** What do you mean by third party?
Yes, I am the registered keeper/owner and I let the driver use it as they help me with various things.
Was the car displaying a permit?
** No it doesn't have a permit as it isn't parked on the estate.
EvenHello,
than
Also, gather evidence:• Take a photo of any “30 minutes free parking” sign to show UKCPM’s own signage contradicts their claim;
• Speak to the caretaker, as planned, to confirm the history and intended use of the drop-off bays.
You have every right to challenge this. Your lease comes first, and neither UKCPM nor Hyde can rewrite it without following proper legal procedures.


...Also, gather evidence:Thank you, that's reassured me.• Take a photo of any “30 minutes free parking” sign to show UKCPM’s own signage contradicts their claim;
• Speak to the caretaker, as planned, to confirm the history and intended use of the drop-off bays.
You have every right to challenge this. Your lease comes first, and neither UKCPM nor Hyde can rewrite it without following proper legal procedures.
Thank you for your reply.Quotetop photo says 21:32:46 and bottom photo says 21:42:50.They are both 21:32, as far as I can see, suggesting they were taken just 4 seconds apart.
If you log onto the PCM online portal, are any other photos available? If so, what time stamps do these show?
There is persuasive case law on this point - if the only photos they have are taken 4 seconds apart, then as b789 says they have not stated the period of parking (required for keeper liability), but further, more basically, their evidence would not seem to show that any alleged contract has been breached if they only have 2 photos taken 4 seconds apart.QuoteWould it be the keeper/driver or both that would need to go to the court case?QuoteThe keeper unless you identify the driver (doing so would mean PCM pursue them instead) - doing this would reduce the number of defence arguments to be made, as they couldn't use the arguments around keeper liability, but there would still seem to be a defence there.
No contract was formed as the Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not state a period of parking which also means that the Keeper cannot be liable for the charge as long as the drivers identity is revealed, inadvertently or otherwise.Thank you for your reply and reassurance.
Additionally, you have shown the sign that states that 30 minutes is allowed for loading and unloading. That contradicts anything in the contractual signs.
As the driver was visiting/loading/unloading you, the tenant/leaseholder, what does your lease/tenancy agreement say about parking and displaying permits? What it doesn't say about parking is equally important.
This can be fought all the way to court if necessary. However, I suggest you approach "Hyde" who I presume are something to do with the landlord or management company, as it is likely they are the party who have contracted CPM and can get the PCN cancelled. That is known as Plan A.
Any appeals are going to be unsuccessful which is why, if Plan A does not work, it will end up as a court claim.





