1
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Is there anything in the Notice of Allocation you received that says something along the lines:
“If you object to this hearing being conducted by telephone/video, you must notify the court…”
I used this letter template to get a hearing listed act St Helens sent to the defendants local court, Adapt as necessary:is this letter relevant to me since they have allocated it to my local court, albeit by telephone?QuoteDear xxxxx.
Thank you for your response.
While I note the Judge has listed the matter for a Telephone Hearing, I must respectfully maintain my position that this case has been misallocated, in breach of CPR 26.2A(2) and Practice Direction 26, paragraph 7.1, which state that a defended claim against an individual must be transferred to the defendant’s local court.
Whether the hearing is by telephone or in person is not the issue; the allocation itself is procedurally incorrect. I ask again that this matter be put before a Judge for judicial reconsideration under CPR 3.3(4) and that I receive written confirmation of the outcome, including reasons if the request is refused.
In parallel, I have:* Filed a formal complaint via the HMCTS service, and
* I’ve raised this matter with my MP, as it reflects a broader pattern of systemic court allocation errors linked to bulk litigation by private parking firms. These errors, along with the aggressive legal tactics used, suggest a deliberate misuse of the civil justice system to pressure individuals into unfair settlements.
I respectfully ask the Court to correct the allocation error without placing further burden on me as a litigant in person and without requiring an N244 application, given the clear language of the Rules.
Yours sincerely,