Free Traffic Legal Advice

I've submitted to popla, and nexus have replied with their evidence. They didn't address the points raised about the NtK being incorrectly written and have instead reiterated about not being parked in a marked bay being the basis for the fine, and have included various photos of signs throughout the docks, and of when i was parked there. I can't post this document here as it is an uneditable pdf with my personal details on it. I need to reply by a week from 6/10/25 (things have been a bit hectic recently so i didn't manage to post earlier).

I was wondering if anyone could please advise me regarding what I might says in reply. Thanks

Here's the text of the document:

The Parking Charge was issued under POFA. In response to the Parking Charge, Mr (removed) - who we are pursuing
as the registered keeper - appealed stating that the NTK is not POFA 2012 compliant and the registered keeper
cannot be held liable.
Rejecting this appeal, we advised that clear signs at the entrance of this site and throughout inform drivers of the
terms and conditions that apply there, and it is not possible to access any part of the premises without passing
multiple signs. Your vehicle was not parked in a designated parking space.
As the keeper did not provide us with details of the driver on the day in question we are pursuing him as the
registered keeper. We can confirm that the Notice to Keeper advises that if the amount requested in the Notice
has not been paid in full (or we have not been informed of the driver's name and current address), the registered
keeper, will, subject to the conditions of, and under the terms of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act
2012, be liable to pay the unpaid Parking Charge.
We can confirm that the Charge was issued on 17/07/2025 and therefore deemed to be delivered on 21/07/2025,
the contrary has not been proven. As such, the Charge was issued within PoFa time limits. We have included in
Section C a copy of the Parking Charge which states the “This Charge is given to you under Paragraph 9(2)(f) of
Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.”.
By allowing his vehicle to be parked on the site, Mr (removed( entered into a valid contract and agreed to abide by its
terms and conditions. The ample signage displayed throughout the site advises the terms and conditions of use.
One of the conditions is that you must be parked within the confines of a marked parking bay and that there is no
parking on pavements. The signage advises that a Parking Charge of £100 will be issued when allowing a vehicle to
remain parked outside of a designated bay.
It is the driver’s responsibility to ensure they comply with the terms and conditions of the site. In this case, by
allowing his vehicle to remain parked outside of a designated marked bay and in a no parking area on a pavement,
Mr (removed) breached those terms and conditions.
We have included in section G photographs taken by the warden which show this vehicle parked outside of a
designated marked bay as the driver was parked in a no parking area on a pavement.
We can confirm that the signage is displayed in compliance with all relevant laws and regulations – please see
images and photographs provided in Section F which support this.
Our position remains that we have received no mitigating circumstances or evidence for which we should cancel
the Parking Charge. We maintain Mr (removed) entered into a valid contract and should pay the valid parking charges
as per the signage on the site.

n.b. had a potato moment but managed to edit my name out

Would mods mind removing this post? The first message may be an issue if it ever goes to ccj

I’ve tried looking for a generic one but they all seem to be tailored for a particular appeal. Does anyone have a generic appeal I could use please

Is there any participles bit of that legislation I should quote in my appeal?

Dear all, I recently got two private parking notices a week apart for parking in what looked to me like an ordinary stretch of road. Whilst the sign was present I assumed it referred to the parking spaces immediately behind it rather than the road itself.
The parking fine says I wasn't in a marked bay, but from what I understood unmarked roads are free to park on generally. The double yellow lines are on the other side of the road.
It appears nexus group uses legal repesentaion from DCBL, which seem to have a habit of writing a lot of threatening letters then not actually bothering to turn up to CCJ.
I was considering either appealing or simply ignoring this, but would like some advice on the matter.
If it did reach CCJ would I stand a reasonable change of winning

N.b this is a repost after the other was removed because it has my address visible
Someone asked if had appealed yet. I have not, would there be any utility in doing so?

Dear all, I recently got two private parking notices a week apart for parking in what looked to me like an ordinary stretch of road. Whilst the sign was present I assumed it referred to the parking spaces immediately behind it rather than the road itself.
The parking fine says I wasn't in a marked bay, but from what I understood unmarked roads are free to park on generally. The double yellow lines are on the other side of the road.
It appears nexus group uses legal repesentaion from DCBL, which seem to have a habit of writing a lot of threatening letters then not actually bothering to turn up to CCJ.
I was considering either appealing or simply ignoring this, but would like some advice on the matter.
If it did reach CCJ would I stand a reasonable change of winning?

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Hi all. I have been parking regularly at a local hospital for months and due to a persitent lack of space, have parked with hundreds of others on verges and pavements (but not whilst blocking them) without issues, so I essentially assumed it was allowed, and have never seen anyone with a parking ticket before. I have nevertheless recently recieved one. It is described as a penalty chanrge notice on the packet, which I thought could only be issues by the police and council? Is this ticket still valid if the hospital is potentially misusing this designation. Ive pasted an imgur of the notice and ticket packet below.

https://imgur.com/a/uy80udF