Free Traffic Legal Advice

Hello, I waited and have still not had a postal NTK. How can I go about the POPLA appeal please?

Thanks, this has been submitted.

UKPC rely on most of their victims being low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree who will pay up out of ignorance and fear.

This is 100% true.

You said to come back nearer to day 27 and then submit an appeal, I assume that's because the notice was attached to the car rather than sent to me in the post?

Thanks for the reply.

As said above the notice lists the condition of the car park's term and conditions that were breached. The vehicle was not parked correctly within the markings of a bay or space, so the ticket says the condition that has been breached is "parked correctly within the markings of a bay or space".

I think with some parking notices issued on private land they can be unfair, but this one seems fairer than most. The vehicle wasn't parked within the bay or space which is one of the conditions of the car park. I just wanted to know if it was worth appealing based on the fact that the only reason the vehicle was parked this way is because the space that was being blocked by parking over the line wouldn't have been useable with the construction fencing there. Do you think an appeal saying that much is likely to be rejected on the basis that their rules are the rules and they have been breached?

From a little bit of research done online it seems to suggest that issuing a postal NTK is not a requirement if one has been left on the vehicle which is how this notice was received.

I am a bit dubious of waiting until day 27 as it will mean that the reduced fee is no longer payable.

I have read through some of the other threads on here and it seems that the tactic is to basically keep refusing to identify the driver until it goes to court and then hope they will drop the case right before the court date? Is that the gist of it?

I am the registered keeper of a vehicle that received a parking charge at the car park listed in the title.

When the driver of the vehicle entered the car park, they parked in a space that was next to some construction work that is ongoing. The space they parked in was adjacent to a space that had construction fencing partially within it. As a car would not have been able to park in the bay with construction fencing partially within it, the driver parked partially in that bay to increase the space between the vehicle and the vehicle in another adjacent space.

Is this worth appealing?

https://imgur.com/qOBRD1R
https://imgur.com/BQKQxWm
https://imgur.com/gIB7okD
https://imgur.com/q2lncDh
https://imgur.com/H8TWI19