Show Posts - Jengie

ThanksN180 DQ now completed and submitted.I will await the mediation call nextBest wishesNicole

My apologies, it was an email addressed to me from DCB legal (not MET parking) with attachments of all correspondence to date.The claim has not yet been assigned to a county court.Thank you so much for outlining the process, so it sounds like I now wait for the N180 DQs before I state the reasons why I think the PCN was issued incorrectly. Is that right?Thank you

I submitted the defence as stated in your post of 21st October and have received an acknowledgement from the CNBC. I have also received an email from MET parking with all the evidence they have - which is basically the copies of the original PCN and my responses, copy of the POPLA appeal and refusal and photos of the car (but the photos are all dark and just show the registration number - there is no evidence of where the car was parked but the photos are date stamped).As MET parking has now responded, do I now need to reply to this and submit another defence to the court (i.e. stating my reasons why I believe the PCN was issued incorrectly? Thanks

The claim is in my name as my husband told MET that I was the driver, which is true. We both know now he shouldn't have done this but we weren't sure what to do at the time and we understood they can still pursue the keeper in the event they weren't told who the driver was

My husband was the registered keeper, he received the letter

The car is no longer in existence as it was written off shortly after  and I was never the registered keeper. Just thought I'd point this out in case it is relevant.

I've redacted personal details and uploaded the claim form and PoC in this dropbox link below:https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/y0x7fz9n8n02lvhf5rpwd/claim-form-201025.pdf?rlkey=p097jznpg8yl116tysgs4ruyl&st=a11z84wi&dl=0Thanks for all your help

Do I have any defence that the letter before claim was insufficient, as per the post above?Does anyone know if I can counter claim for costs?e.g. time off work to attend the hearing? Any advice appreciated as I had not expected them to proceed with court claim.

Ok, so I have now been sent the particulars of the claim, they are claiming £185.52 + court £35.00 + legal costs £50, total £270.52 so the original claim is has increased from £100 to £185.52. I will send an acknowledgemenet of service to get an extra 14 days to reply.Should I dispute the amount claimed in the defence?

s

ok thanks, I will delete the link but can't see how to?Any advice re the response?

I have just googled the Civil National Business Centre and it seems to be a court for disputes between businesses. I am an individual not a business so I'm not sure why they have sent a letter from the CNBS rather than the small claims court. Also, there is no date by which I have to respond?This all seems a bit odd.

Imagur is no longer working so I've uploaded the letter to dropbox. Can you see it?

So, I emailed your suggested response on 5th October and received no reply.  I have now received a letter from HM Courts & Tribunals service with a claim form attached from the civil national business cenre dated 15th October.So it's look like they are proceeding with the court claim. I will upload the claim form. So, I now have to write a defence, correct?

Thank you, I'll send the response you suggest.  Good point also about the driver being the customer.