3. Messages

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Jengie

Pages: [1] 2
1
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: May 28, 2026, 11:55:33 am »
Thank you. Just wondering next steps as my defence was that the claimant had not provided sufficient details of their claim. Assuming they now do so (and I will copy it here), do I get 28 days from the date they file their revised details of claim?

2
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: May 28, 2026, 11:50:01 am »
Not sure how to attach but the letter says:

It is ordered that:

1. The claimant must by (14 days) file and serve a Fully Particularised Particulars of Claim to include full details of:

a. the terms of the alleged contract which has been breached;
b. how the alleged contract was breached (including date, time and location);
c. A breakdown of the sums claimed.

2. The Defendant must by (28 days) file and serve a Fully Particularised Amended Defence to the Fully Particularised Particulars of Claim.

3. Note: A party affected by this order may apply, not more than 7 days after it is served on the m, to have it set aside, varied or stayed.

Dated 27 May 2026

3
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: May 28, 2026, 11:43:03 am »
Hi.
I received this from the county court today. I think I need to put together a defence - is this within 28 days of the claimant filing their Full paticulars of Claim?


4
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: April 19, 2026, 08:19:20 pm »
thank you, now re-submitted, together with the acknowledgement of receipt

5
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: April 19, 2026, 07:18:33 pm »
Sorry, I was getting confused.

I did submit the defence you provided as per #32 and have a copy of it, and also a letter from HM Courts & Tribunals Service which says 'I acknowledge receipt of your defence. A copy is being served on the claimant.' etc etc.

The defence as per #32 was about how the claimant didn't provide enough details etc, do I now have to include reasons why I believe the parking ticket was not valid, i.e. I stayed less than the permitted 90 minutes and was a customer?.

Thanks

6
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: April 19, 2026, 06:48:18 pm »
ok will do. The defence was never submitted to the court by me, only to the parking cmpany and then the parking ombudsman (a year and a half ago) so I guess MET parking didn't include it - is it their responsibility to include my defence?

Anyway, will send something in during the week.


7
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: April 19, 2026, 05:18:43 pm »
Good afternoon, so mediation was completed and I have now received an email from the Court which says:

 
The District Judge requests that the Court writes to you as follows:
 

“The defence is missing please attach by way of reply”

So, should I put together a defence along the lines of my original defence as stated above when this thread started?

Thanks


8
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: December 29, 2025, 01:16:08 pm »
Thanks
N180 DQ now completed and submitted.
I will await the mediation call next
Best wishes
Nicole

9
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: November 17, 2025, 10:24:17 pm »
My apologies, it was an email addressed to me from DCB legal (not MET parking) with attachments of all correspondence to date.
The claim has not yet been assigned to a county court.
Thank you so much for outlining the process, so it sounds like I now wait for the N180 DQs before I state the reasons why I think the PCN was issued incorrectly. Is that right?
Thank you


10
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: November 16, 2025, 04:19:19 pm »
I submitted the defence as stated in your post of 21st October and have received an acknowledgement from the CNBC. I have also received an email from MET parking with all the evidence they have - which is basically the copies of the original PCN and my responses, copy of the POPLA appeal and refusal and photos of the car (but the photos are all dark and just show the registration number - there is no evidence of where the car was parked but the photos are date stamped).
As MET parking has now responded, do I now need to reply to this and submit another defence to the court (i.e. stating my reasons why I believe the PCN was issued incorrectly?
Thanks

11
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: October 24, 2025, 08:00:37 am »
The claim is in my name as my husband told MET that I was the driver, which is true.
We both know now he shouldn't have done this but we weren't sure what to do at the time and we understood they can still pursue the keeper in the event they weren't told who the driver was

12
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: October 23, 2025, 08:48:19 pm »
My husband was the registered keeper, he received the letter

13
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: October 21, 2025, 09:29:42 pm »
The car is no longer in existence as it was written off shortly after  and I was never the registered keeper. Just thought I'd point this out in case it is relevant.

14
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: October 21, 2025, 09:28:00 pm »
I've redacted personal details and uploaded the claim form and PoC in this dropbox link below:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/y0x7fz9n8n02lvhf5rpwd/claim-form-201025.pdf?rlkey=p097jznpg8yl116tysgs4ruyl&st=a11z84wi&dl=0

Thanks for all your help

15
Private parking tickets / Re: MET parking fine Krispy Kreme Donuts New Malden - parked within time limit but they say driver was not a customer
« on: October 20, 2025, 01:23:57 pm »
Do I have any defence that the letter before claim was insufficient, as per the post above?
Does anyone know if I can counter claim for costs?
e.g. time off work to attend the hearing?
Any advice appreciated as I had not expected them to proceed with court claim.

Pages: [1] 2