Show Posts - Vim Fuego

The advice said I would be on the phone waiting for hours. I don't have the time to spare unfortunately and the 'victim' needed some clarity sooner rather than later due other very significant personal matters taking place in her life right now.  I shall pass on your advice about getting the CCJ set aside. I haven't given up anything, this was never my battle, I was trying to help in any way I could.Thankyou for all the advice.

An upate.I paid for the online portal that checks if there is a CCJ in the system and there was.It appears that the intermediate letters that I thought hadn't been delivered had been, but picked up unbeknown to me and ignored.So, the upshot appears that it was a legitimate process and the now the car owner is now siginficantly more out of pocket than she should have been. Thanks everyone who offered advice, my sincere apologies for wasting your time.Lessons learned;1. There was a stone-bonker excuse, correctly declared at the right time would have seen no financial charge.2. If anyone still thinks that 'ignore them and they'll go away' is a valid option, it is not.I can only hope the CCJ has been settled in time to show it as satisfied. Records of the transction were made every step of the way.

Thankyou. I shall get onto it in the morning.

Thanks for the reply. In answer to your questions;1. Correctly addressed as per the V52. I believe it was ignored, pending further contact3. Her address hasn't changed4. I collect about 99.7% of the post. She collects zero. The other 0.3% would be her mother so between us we would have spotted the envelope.Regarding point 4., we would have been on the look out for the letter from Northampton Court, but would have expected other correspondance before that.Is the second CCJ letter a genuine document? Can we proactively contact someone/somewhere to see if it factually correct?

Hi, my adult step daughter has received a PCN from PE for an alleged carpark overstay infringement in August 2024 in a car park in England. It is disputed with solid evidence in favour of the driver and they are willing to see the legal process through to the bitter end. My wife and I have successfully challenged PE before which resulted in them dropping the case days before a hearing, so we are familiar with most of the process. The first communication (08.24) was the letter outlining the alleged infringement and photos supporting the identity of the vehicle concerned. The second letter sent 24.12.24 is titled 'County Court Judgement' and a hiked fee to pay to PE. It claims that no defence was offered but there are no details of where/when the case was heard. There is a single reference number which is the same as the PE reference number on the first letter. There are no court details in the letter. The reference number is not recognised by the Registry Trust. We know from experience that there should be many more stages to this before a proper CCJ is issued, including the part where the details of defence are submitted. Is this letter just another scare tactic used by PE to get paid or has something gone wrong? Our previous encounter took many months to even have a hearing date issued. Any advice appreciated. [ Guests cannot view attachments ]