Show Posts - anon_fox

hey again friends,The latest is I've received an email about a mediation appointment phone call.How do these usually go down? And any advice on how to proceed and what the outcome usually is would be really appreciated.Thanks in advance x

Hello again.I emailed dcb legal and got an automated response and then nothing.Until today I received the paper work attached. They did not decide to file a defence in response to mine or to provide the information missing in their original claim.I should add this paper work comes more than 28 days after I received the original small claims court paperwork. I have no idea what it means or how to fill it out so any help appreciated.https://imgur.com/a/41FZt65

Thank you.I’m guessing they want to negotiate on the phone. They haven’t provided me with an email dress, should I contact the generic one?

Hello again helpful friend! I had a call today from dbc legal to say they received my defence and would like to speak to me. They then asked me to select the option to speak with someone and I was put in a cue, almost like I had contacted them. Is this the correct way for them to contact me? I wanted to ask your advice and find out if I do call them back what they are likely to say and how I should respond. Thanks in advance

Thank you, would you mind confirming the best way to mark the transcripts as exhibit a and b.I have written the following email and attached the documents:Please find attached the defence, draft order and two case law transcripts in the matter of CP Plus t/a GroupNexus v (name) Claim Number (number)Exhibit A: CELvChan appeal transcript (attached)Exhibit B: CPM v AKANDE (attached)

Fantastic!I have just drafted up the email and inputted my information.Should this be sent of asap or is there any reason to delay response?

Hi,Thank you so much for your help, the walkthrough was a life saver. I’ve completed that step this morning and have until 25th of Nov to submit my defence (33 days from issue)Please advise me how to respond from here.

Back in January the driver visited a business that claimed on their website to provide lots of on site parking. Having not visited before, as they were approaching, they saw a large sign of their logo 'LEXTAN' with a car park (see photo). They drove in and parked up and were confident they were parked in the correct place as there was no other parking in the area.Fast forward to May and a letter from debt collectors or ‘solicitors’ DCB legal, claimant Group nexus asking for £170 for parking at Buzz bingo ( an establishment never visited) assuming it was a scam or a mistake the letter was ignored. (It's now become clear that the original fine must have gone to an old address as the vehicles V5 has only just been updated) obviously if this had been seen it could have been appealed sooner.There's now a CCJ issued for £260. Realising this isn’t a scam the driver went back through their diary and texts etc and identified when and where the incident happened. they returned to try and figure out how the signs were missed. In defence, the signage looks as though it only applies to the left side of the car park, directly in front of the buzz bingo building.  Images show where the car was parked. The part of the car park directly in front of the Buzz bingo building has signs on the walls all over the car park stating you can pay to park on an app (no other way to pay) however the small section the car was parked in is separate to this and has no signposts. It was a genuine mistake thinking that the car park belonged to LEXTAN.Furthermore after measuring the writing on the sign, I don’t believe it adheres to the guidelines set out by the parking association for private car park signs.The road leading up to the car park is 30mph and the title text is only 50mm.I’m wondering if theres any point disputing the claim - given there was no appeal and the address on the v5 wasn't updated. Am I likely to incur extra legal costs on top of the already £260? What’s the best response to the CCJ in this case?https://imgur.com/JBpJMN6https://imgur.com/xKtyAlAhttps://imgur.com/PXeJhiNhttps://imgur.com/ppLepJhhttps://imgur.com/PamQtk1https://imgur.com/PwcpD54https://imgur.com/UuMTU8Ghttps://imgur.com/ONLNC1S

Back in January I visited a business that claimed on their website to provide lots of on site parking. I had not visited before and as I was approaching saw a large sign of their logo with a car park (see photo one). I drove in and parked up and when I walked to the front of the business I was confident I was parked in the correct place as there was no other parking in the area.Fast forward to May and I get a letter from debt collectors or ‘solicitors’ DCB legal  from Group nexus asking for £170 for parking at Buzz bingo ( an establishment I had never visited) I assumed at the time it was a scam or a mistake so I ignored it. (I realised now that the original fine must have gone to my old address as I’ve only recent updated my vehicles V5) obviously had I seen this they probably would have included photo evidence and I would have realised I needed to appeal. I’ve now been issued a CCJ for £260. Realising this isn’t a scam I went back through my diary and texts etc and identified when and where the incident happened. I returned to try and figure out how I missed the signs. In my defence, the signage looks to me as though it only applied to the left side of the car park, directly in front of the buzz bingo building. I’ve shown in the images where I parked. The part of the car park directly in front of the Buzz bingo building has signs on the walls all over the car park stating you can pay to park on an app (no other way to pay) however the small section I parked in is separate to this and has no signposts. I genuinely thought this was free parking for LEXTAN the business I was visiting. Furthermore I measured the writing on the sign and I don’t believe it adheres to the guidelines set out by the parking association for private car park signs.I’m wondering if I have a leg to stand on if I dispute the claim. I didn’t appeal in the first 28 days due to wrong address on V5 which is my own fault so I can’t argue that I thought the letters were a scam because the original letters most likely had photos on. But is there a chance I’ll win on the grounds of bad signage. Am I likely to incur extra legal costs on top of the already £260? What’s the best response to the CCJ in this case?