1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Merton multiple PCN for parking without residents permit
« on: June 07, 2025, 09:10:31 am »
Interesting points on the code 19. I’ve checked and it is included in Merton’s own Enforcement handbook.
“Notes:
Code 19 should only be issued if a permit that is or was valid for that bay is used but is invalid at time of PCN due to:
It has expired
It is in the wrong vehicle
Obscured date/ VRM”
So it would seem that this is what should have been issued, though there is no qualification on when a permit expired, only that it was valid and has expired.
I suspect as Merton moved parking systems, there may have been no record on the new system of my expired permit on the old system.
If I went down a formal appeal route as HC Anderson says, is it likely to be considered a tangible defence?
“Notes:
Code 19 should only be issued if a permit that is or was valid for that bay is used but is invalid at time of PCN due to:
It has expired
It is in the wrong vehicle
Obscured date/ VRM”
So it would seem that this is what should have been issued, though there is no qualification on when a permit expired, only that it was valid and has expired.
I suspect as Merton moved parking systems, there may have been no record on the new system of my expired permit on the old system.
If I went down a formal appeal route as HC Anderson says, is it likely to be considered a tangible defence?