The failure to furnish is also a far more serious offence with 6 points minimum penalty. You basically have to decide whether you want to pursue the fail to furnish which is possible but often fraught with difficulties, or following the stat dec and re prosecution of both offences, do a plea bargain to accept the speeding charge if the FtF is dropped. They nearly always oblige.
Thankyou
The SJPN has only the failure to furnish charge on it.
Not the speeding offence which it refers to.
Does that make any difference in the options you have outlined above?
The reason I was asking about the timescales is because I thought the speeding offence hasn’t been added because it is out of time.
If that is the case then there is question over the timescales for the FtF offence and whether that is also out of time.
Everywhere I’ve read there is no definite on when the 6 months timescales start and end.
Does it start with the first s172 request +29 days
Or depending on how many letters they send out they can pick at date off one of them?
It’s seems having read a few other instances that it’s normally the first - if I’ve been sent another letter and they’ve chosen that date to use isn’t that just them stretching the timescales in an effort to enable a charge saying that the speeding charge is out of time.
Then there is no info on where the 6 month timescale ends.
Is it that the SJPN has to be sent before the 6month deadline?
I know I’m probably clutching at straws but I do have solicitors letter regarding the mail going missing at the property dated around the same time period, so I do think I stand a good chance of arguing the not received.