Free Traffic Legal Advice

Thank you all for the advice.

I have just had an email from the Arena Shopping Management who have got the PCN cancelled for me. Im glad to not have to bang my head against this but its such a shame as to how easily they will try and rip of the ordinary motorist.

Appreciate the input HC Andersen.

This is still very early days so I'll give Tesco and arena shopping admin till the later end of this week and if I don't hear back from them, then I'll submit the appeal to PP which should still be within 14 days.

Are you of the opinion that I shouldn't use the below text and use what you have suggested?

Thanks

I dispute your 'parking charge', as the keeper of the vehicle. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner.

As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL the requirements of PoFA 2012, namely no "invitation", or any synonym of the word, for the keeper to pay the charge as per paragraph 9(2)(e)(i), you are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions can be drawn.

Since your PCN is a vague template, I require an explanation of the allegations and your evidence. You must include a close up actual photograph of the sign you contend was at the location on the material date as well as your images of the vehicle.

I suggest you cancel the PCN or issue me with a POPLA code.

Thank you all.

Will try and contact Tesco but I noticed previously that there was a big sign on the front doors saying to contact Premier Park in case of any parking issues and not contact Tesco. I presume they have had issues in the past. I will take a Look at the signage to see what other details are there.

There were no disabled bays available hence why it was parked in a normal bay.

What grounds would I submit an appeal on to PP (and further to POPLA if required)? Is the driver not technically still in breach of their "laws"? How does one argue against it? Can I use the unclear photos to my advantage?