Show Posts - Supasta

Thank you all for the advice. I have just had an email from the Arena Shopping Management who have got the PCN cancelled for me. Im glad to not have to bang my head against this but its such a shame as to how easily they will try and rip of the ordinary motorist.

So You would agree with the appeal point put forward by HC Andersen in that case or do you have a different view point? Thanks again to everyone thats helping. Quote from: DWMB2 on 12 Aug, 2024 21:18QuoteTo do it vice-versa risks you missing the contractor's appeals deadline while you wait for a reply from Tesco Only if they let the appeal deadline pass. My personal view is that contacting Tesco first is wise. If they intervene, no need to faff about with Premier.I think I disagree with b789's suggested appeal here. Where one has a meritoious point about the actual alleged breach (ie how marginal it is), my view is this should be front and centre. Technical appeal points have their place, but where there's a strong reason the charge shouldn't have been issued at all, this should be raised.

Appreciate the input HC Andersen. This is still very early days so I'll give Tesco and arena shopping admin till the later end of this week and if I don't hear back from them, then I'll submit the appeal to PP which should still be within 14 days. Are you of the opinion that I shouldn't use the below text and use what you have suggested? ThanksQuoteI dispute your 'parking charge', as the keeper of the vehicle. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner.As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL the requirements of PoFA 2012, namely no "invitation", or any synonym of the word, for the keeper to pay the charge as per paragraph 9(2)(e)(i), you are unable to hold the keeper of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions can be drawn.Since your PCN is a vague template, I require an explanation of the allegations and your evidence. You must include a close up actual photograph of the sign you contend was at the location on the material date as well as your images of the vehicle.I suggest you cancel the PCN or issue me with a POPLA code.

Thanks. I've shot an email to the tesco CEO and have also sent the same email to the Arena Shopping Park management as well. Shall I wait a few days before submitting the formal appeal to PP? Cheers.

Thank you all. Will try and contact Tesco but I noticed previously that there was a big sign on the front doors saying to contact Premier Park in case of any parking issues and not contact Tesco. I presume they have had issues in the past. I will take a Look at the signage to see what other details are there. There were no disabled bays available hence why it was parked in a normal bay. What grounds would I submit an appeal on to PP (and further to POPLA if required)? Is the driver not technically still in breach of their "laws"? How does one argue against it? Can I use the unclear photos to my advantage?

Hi all. A disabled driver got this parking ticket for parking just on the white line - the line isn’t clearly visible in the photo but the car is not over it completely. Are there any grounds for appeal on this? Also just for completion sake blue badge was displayed but this wasn’t a disabled spot.Image of notice is here - https://imgur.com/a/BPTAX58