Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Hustler6969

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
I don't seem to see an option to modify the old posts for some reason..

I'll go ahead with the appeal for now then and will ask for more help at the assessor appeal stage for any more 'robust' wording.

Thanks

2
Having seen another appeal on this forum, please can anyone advise if this sounds sufficient, thanks.

I am appealing this alleged charge as the registered keeper on the grounds that this Parking Charge Notice is not compliant with PoFA 2012 Schedule 4 Paragraphs 6(1)(b) and 9(2), which requires that a "period of parking" be specified on the notice. I therefore ask that this PCN is immediately cancelled.


3
Does the period of parking they have mentioned in the letter count?

Also, to be compliant does the letter itself had to have said what the restricted time period is or can the info be elsewhere like the portal and so on?

Just FYI portal has no additional pictures other than the two shown in the letter.

Please can you provide some wording of what appeal should say? Thanks

4
Hi all,

Could do with a bit of advice please - received this Parking Eye PCN (front and back) in the post few days ago.

Basically 'the car occupants' were just in 'holiday mode' on the way back from a long weekend away, there was some roadworks/wild fires or something that weekend and ended up taking a bit of a diversion - the car found itself driving through the beautiful University of Surrey campus.

Car still had a few leftover snacks and 'the car occupants' spotted a nice fountain/pond/park opposite to this car park so basically 'the car' ended up being parked in this car park while car occupants briefly explored this pond area and sat on a bench for a bit. Essentially with students away for the summer the whole place was deserted and quiet so didn't think much of it at all at the time.

Unfortunately of course it appears I've received this PCN now. This is the GSV view when entering the car park (from 2024 it seems), unfortunately when you jump forward closer to the signs on the wall (by the CAT van for example which is roughly probably where the car was parked) the date on the photos seem to jump back to 2019, so I'm not sure how representative the signage shown on GSV might be of what it is now.  I just think if it was super apparent one would've thought twice, but then again as I say maybe the driver was in holiday mode..

Could do with a bit of advice please on wether this PCN is valid/compliant (and if not why) and/or can/should I be challenging this. Thanks in advance.

5
Also received this letter (Page 1 & 2) on Thursday 13/8/26 claiming PoFA satisfied and asking for payment again within 14 days - what should I do with this and in general further correspondence - ignore unless its a Letter Before Claim?

Thanks

6
Okay, do ParkingEye regularly try to take people to court?

7
So it turns out the request to appeal was turned down about two hrs after it was put in with this:

“Dear Sir/Madam

Your request to submit a late appeal has been denied.

The evidence you provided did not meet the necessary requirements and we are unable to grant access to the appeals process.

For further information, please refer to the original Parking Charge Notice, which outlines the timeframe and requirements for submitting an appeal.

If you would like to make payment, please click here.

Kind Regards,

Parkingeye Team”

What can/should I do now?

8
Okay just done that thanks, only 500 characters allowed so not sufficient to do the whole appeal anyway. Apparently there should be a response within 7 days so we'll see.

9
Just an additional development, so I went into appeal just now, having waited just a little longer to see if I get a response from the ASDA CEO inbox (haven't).

As can be seen in the picture of the back of the charge notice it says "Appeals should be submitted within 28 days of the delivery of the Parking Charge..". The letter said date of event 02/07, date of issue 06/07 (never received anything), and date of the letter itself as 13/07. So by the maths I'd done from the latest date had told myself I'd appeal by 10th/11th (28 days from the 13/07).

When I go into the appeals portal it says this: "You are out of time to appeal the Parking Charge and will be unable to access our appeals process. If there are exceptional circumstances that can be evidenced, you may be eligible to submit a late appeal. Please click here for more information". If i 'click' for more information it does lets me put in some details (name, status of who's applying registered keeper etc.) then put in an appeal - so my question is: do i mention this date discrepancy with the appeal process in the appeal if so what do I say? Conscious they might try to reject by just saying 'out of time'..

If anyone can respond I'd appreciate it please

10
Yes I'll use InterCity125's suggestion as in - my confusion was around Sander333's post (i.e. his calculation and when it'll be assumed legally that the letter was received (even though I received it later) but would have nothing to prove it and so on..but perhaps that's a discussion for later)

11
Can anyone please provide me with any specific wording that I need to put in my appeal then?

Appeal for parking charge notice - xxxxxxx

I am appealing as the Registered Keeper of the vehicle in question.

The driver is not known to yourselves and there is no legal requirement for me to disclose such details to an unregulated parking operator.

I have duly noted your entirely misleading wording (on the PCN) which states that the driver is 'required to pay or appeal' - no such legislation exists (requiring the driver to do anything) and I will now be making a formal complaint to the CMA since this is exactly the behaviour which they are now clamping down on.

Your options are now-

1. Save further time, money and resources and cancel the PCN

OR

2. Reject this appeal and provide me with a POPLA code for a slam dunk appeal.


I am unable to help you further.


Wishes,

xxxxx xxxxxxxxx


Thanks for that - very useful. Should I be mentioning anything around POFA 2012 and the timing issue (which I don't think I fully understand myself!) as per some of the input before yourself?

12
Can anyone please provide me with any specific wording that I need to put in my appeal then?

13
Out of interest is there any other Asda store in Ashford?
Nope

14
Hi all,

Received this PCN (front & back) from Parking eye a little while ago for an 'overstay' beyond 2 hours at an ASDA carpark. Bit of a delay with posting here due to being busy with the start of the summer but the dates of receipt for this were a bit awkward anyway - alleged overstay of was 02/07/26, issue date seems to be 06/07/26, date on the letter is 13/07/26 (note it might say 'reminder' but this is the first letter!) and I could have received it no earlier than 17th or 18th July as I found it on the mat on the 19th Sunday having been away from the 17th for a long weekend.

I can elaborate on circumstances but in general was a case of lots of back and forth between car and shop to get different bits I'd forgotten each time/queues etc. (various things we needed to go away at short notice etc.). Have some receipts on me (6 transactions) timed towards the back end of the window, card statement shows another 2 transactions but had binned those receipts by the time the PCN came through.

Have already contacted CEO@asda.com with a strongly worded email and PCN pictures/receipts but haven't heard back yet so will let know here if I do. Must have spent thousands if not tens of thousands of pounds with the store over the years..

Believe the 'discount' deadline was 19th (the day I found it!) so that has gone but the appeal deadline will be 10th/11th August so would appreciate your help in tackling this please/advice on next steps - appeal to ParkingEye/POPLA (if so what to say) or to ignore? And before anyone asks, happy to go all the way with this.

Thanks all.

15
Here are the T&Cs that I received in my contract email.

Only relevant bits from it seem to be:

"4. Renter's Main Obligations

(a) Renter is required to:

....

(viii) pay any administrative fines, fees, charges, costs, penalties, or other fines that are imposed, issued or incurred in connection with the Renter's usage of the Vehicle during the Rental Period (including usage of the Vehicle by Authorised Drivers or other third parties who are permitted by Renter to use the Vehicle), such as fines or fees for illegal parking or speeding, non-compliance with bus lane, congestion charges, tolls or violations of the rules of the highway or traffic offence or contravention in any country, in all cases, and not caused by Owner;
"

&

"5. Rental Costs and other Charges; Additional Services

...

(d) Renter shall pay to Owner:

(i) any amounts not paid by Renter in accordance with section 4(a)(viii);

(ii) an administration fee of up to £45 for rentals originating in the UK and up to €35 for rentals originating in Ireland for processing any fines or offences against the Vehicle, Owner, Renter, any Authorised Driver or any other person Renter permitted to use the Vehicle during the Rental Period, unless caused through Owner’s own fault;
"

So I should take that to mean pretty clearly that 'I' am liable to pay any toll charges or fines relating to it to the issuing authority (rather than them), and only then am liable to pay the the owner if I haven't done so?

Also just for people that've been responding, as the PCN is accessible online, can I just not go in and appeal. As the enterprise letter (linked in OP) also says "To appeal this fine, please present this letter directly to the Issuing Agency. Please accept this document as confirmation that Enterprise Rent-A-Car authorise the issuing agent to communicate directly with the nominated person in relation to the notice issued during the vehicle hire period."

Of course then in the beginning paragraphs it contradicts the latter part of the letter by saying
"Enterprise has paid for this violation/offence promptly in order to avoid additional penalties, and in turn, require full reimbursement for these charges."

Pages: [1] 2 3 4