Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - samir_d

Pages: [1] 2
1
The letters stopped and I never did hear back from them so as far as i'm concerned, case is closed 🙌
They may well have given up, but don't throw anything away yet, they technically have up to 6 years from the date of the alleged parking event to begin court proceedings.

Good to know - Thanks!

2
Samir, did you get a reply? You never updated us on your case. I am in the same position, I want to know if it's worth appealing, or what the court said.

Hi,
The letters stopped and I never did hear back from them so as far as i'm concerned, case is closed 🙌

3
3170 was a typo, should have been £170  :D
That's a relief, I know they're money-grubbing, but that'd have been a bit much!

 ;D  ;D  ;D

4
Thanks for the replies.  Ok, will wait for the Letter of Claim (LOC).
3170 was a typo, should have been £170  :D

5
Hi there,
I've received a souple of letters telling titled "Notice of Transfer to Solicitors".  They have stated this is this the last chance to pay "3170 before it goes to QDR Solicitors Limited.  I'm not paying the fine so should I continue to ignore?

Thanks in advance

6

Thank you 🙌.  In that case I won't bother with the IAS as it seems a pointless exercise.  Regarding the letter of claim, what should I do when that arrives?

The response to an LoC is to deny any liability and demand that they provide proof of their allegation. There is a template you can use which lets them know they are not going to be dealing with low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree who are going to capitulate and pay up.

Cross that bridge, if/when it happens. Please don’t tell us about or show us any debt collector letters. They are powerless ans should be ignored. Some may be dressed up to look like an LoC but will only give you 14 days to pay. A real LoC must give you 30 days.

If/when you receive a real LoC, show us.

Got it!  Many many thanks B789 🙌

7
Quote
Can I confirm the advice is to not appeal
The advice is that appeals to the IAS rarely succeed. If you want to roll the dice with the IAS, then go for it, doing so is not detrimental to your case, but if you're busy, then you may decide it is not worth the effort. If you choose not to, then ignore the debt collectors and wait for a Letter of Claim.

Thank you 🙌.  In that case I won't bother with the IAS as it seems a pointless exercise.  Regarding the letter of claim, what should I do when that arrives?

8
You will still get “threatening” letters once the IAS reject your appeal. Whilst the letters may seem “threatening”, they are in fact, harmless. They are designed to get the low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree to capitulate and pay up because they don’t understand the process and imagine that bailiffs can simply come knocking at their door.

Are you low-hanging fruit ripe for the picking?

Hi, I was away and got back a few days ago.  Can I confirm the advice is to not appeal and ignore the threatening letters NPM will no doubt send?
Thanks

9
And the rest of the rejection?

The 3rd page  just states that if do not pay or appeal before the end of the 28 day period the penalty charge may increase by 50% to £195 and a charge certificate may be served.  The rest of the rejection are just forms to complete for the adjudicator

10
You need to show us exactly what you wrote in your reps.

This was my appeal for both:
Hi, I received a PCN for traffic contravention 38l however there are no Signs advising I cannot drive through the opening ahead of the bollards and there are no signs displaying a camera is in operation. I happened to notice a camera but it is completely hidden behind trees and is not visible at all. If you can please tell me where the camera sign is and where it says I cannot drive through the opening ahead of the bollards. Thank You

11

Can someone help by reviewing the PCN and Pictures I have attached to see if I have case to fight?

Each separate PCN - two separate, two different times- is annotated 'Appealed online 3 July'.

There's nothing for you to do other than to await the authority's response.

Hi,
I received formal rejections to both my appeals. The letter is dated 05/08/24 and i probably received a few days later but I was on Holiday between 06/08 to 17/08.  I have until tomorrow midnight to either meet the 14 days discount or I can appeal to the Adjudicator.

 

Incandescent said:
"I assume from your narrative that you have received 2 PCNs for the one contravention. Can you please post up the 2nd one. This should not have been served if it is for the journey that took you through the restriction. It is a basic principle of law that you cannot be penalised more than once for a single transgression.

Also looking via GSV, there seems to be no advance warning of this restriction at all, and if one comes to it with a wide vehicle, has no means of turning round and going back."


If this is the case, can someone help me to formulate a reply to the Adjudicator or should I just pay both PCN's.
I have posted the reply for one of the Rejections however, both rejections are exactly the same.



12
Should I go ahead and submit my appeal.  I can probably edit and use the writeup that I originally appealed with?  Should I include anything else?
Thanks in advance..

13
 :D  :D  :D
No way!! Lets fight this all the way through IAS!!

14
by official i meant that the the situation is formalised with no threatening letters from bailiffs instead if simply ignoring NPM letters.

As you said the appeal is rarely upheld so i prefer the route the IAS Appeal Route.

15
Thanks.
In your opinion, What do you suggest? I'm ok with either but IAS seems like a better route as it's official right?  If I go with the IAS route, do you mind helping me with the appeal writeup?

Pages: [1] 2