1
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: September 30, 2025, 09:21:29 pm »
Anyone?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: September 26, 2025, 11:07:34 am »
Can anyone support with the tribunal step please?
3
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: September 25, 2025, 01:55:27 pm »
I used the reps that you advised above verbatim and now want to go to Tribunal with these points, the lack of signage, mix up of dates on Lambeth's website and the address error!
4
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: September 25, 2025, 11:47:32 am »
Only just got a response from Lambeth rejecting my formal appeal. We moved house just after the challenge was made and despite providing our new address in my representations and changing address with the DVLA, they still sent it to our old address. Therefore we have had to call and request online for them to send a copy and they have emailed it in a PDF (please see below).
https://imgur.com/a/5CW6fT8
https://imgur.com/a/5CW6fT8
5
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: August 13, 2025, 10:13:08 am »As regards formal reps, I'd submit the same as before but with a slight change.
PCN *******
On *** informal representations were made against this PCN, the central theme of which was the council's failure to ensure the placing 'on or near the road of such traffic signs in such positions as the order making authority may consider requisite for securing that adequate information as to the effect of the order is made available to persons using the road' contrary to The Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996 and the council's Temporary Traffic Order which created the restriction. Those representations set out the legal framework in detail.
On ** the authority rejected those representations in a manner which could best be described as off-hand without any attempt to address the grounds in detail and in the mistaken belief that a traffic order is a traffic sign whose display meets the council's LATOR obligations.
Those representations are herewith submitted as my formal representations and, in accordance with the Secretary of State's statutory guidance, should these be rejected the authority is required to 'give the owner clear and full reasons for its decision..,', failure to do which may be seen as 'maladministration'.
Yours
Wait for comments.
So would this count as procedural impropriety on the part of the enforcement authority? I need to choose the grounds for my representation.
6
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: August 12, 2025, 02:37:41 pm »
Thanks will submit the above. Should I also include mention of Lambeth's online requests to pay the fine even after I had submitted my initial appeal? I'm aware this point alone has successfully won cases at tribunal (please screenshot in my earlier post on the 1st page of this thread).
7
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: August 11, 2025, 07:38:21 pm »
Earlier rejection addressed to me and NTO addressed to her confusingly. Maybe it's because I have previous with them in this car!
8
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: August 11, 2025, 10:34:55 am »
https://imgur.com/a/ElSJTEt
My wife is actually the registered keeper but I was the driver at the time and made the initial appeal in my name.
My wife is actually the registered keeper but I was the driver at the time and made the initial appeal in my name.
9
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: August 11, 2025, 10:15:57 am »
NTO received, though dated 18th July, I only saw it yesterday as just back from holiday so am a bit late to the party.
10
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: July 02, 2025, 02:53:03 pm »
https://imgur.com/a/CzBLSJA
Lambeth have rejected my appeal. They state that 'signage is present at the location and meet necessary requirements for enforcement action'. As stated above, there were no temporary traffic signs on the day and they have been unable to evidence any, respite their assertion. Furthermore, their website was still urging me to pay 80 quid even after I had submitted my appeal (see screenshot in earlier post).
I am awaiting the NTO to formally challenge.
Lambeth have rejected my appeal. They state that 'signage is present at the location and meet necessary requirements for enforcement action'. As stated above, there were no temporary traffic signs on the day and they have been unable to evidence any, respite their assertion. Furthermore, their website was still urging me to pay 80 quid even after I had submitted my appeal (see screenshot in earlier post).
I am awaiting the NTO to formally challenge.
11
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth PCN 52m Tulsemere Road
« on: June 23, 2025, 11:31:52 am »
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
12
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: June 08, 2025, 09:29:08 am »
Lo and behold the signs have since been covered and replaced with signs for the new traffic order
13
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: June 06, 2025, 10:57:33 am »
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
15
Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) / Re: Lambeth 01a - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed hours (temporary t
« on: June 04, 2025, 09:33:17 am »
Do you think it's better to appeal as above on the basis that The Traffic Management Order is invalid or due to procedural impropriety?