Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - AceKingPin

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Ok thanks everyone for their help. Looks like I'll proceed without contesting in that case.

2
Thank you @baroudeur. I obtained the location from them - it looks like it was opposite the RTS business park on https://w3w.co/tracks.moss.motel.

Using a Google maps streetview search, I cannot see any 30 mph signs on the approach to this area, nor any speed camera warning signs, after the roundabout from Derby city itself.

The area is an industrial park area with no residential properties, and is an A-road (A5194) for what it's worth.

Does any of the above form a contestable reason to dispute this at all?

Is there any way I can verify the lack of signage (the Google streetview photos are between 1 and 3 years old)?

Many thanks and kind regards,

3
Thank you @FuzzyDuck. Looking through the evidence, the camera was a LTI 20.20 Ultralyte 1000 mobile speed camera, so it must be one of the mobile sites. Before I ask the constabulary for photos, would you have the 2 locations of both known mobile cameras?

Many thanks and kind regards

4
Hello,

The vehicle in question was recorded as doing 39 mph in a 30 mph zone on 19/10/25. It is a lease vehicle, so the Derbyshire Constabulary contacted the registered keeper on 23/10/25. The registered keeper responded with the driver details on 29/10/25 by email. However, the leaseholder did not receive the NIP until 18/11/25. I was the driver and received the revised notice on 27/11/25.

The location was identified as only London Road Derby, but there is no other location information to pinpoint the camera that recorded this speed.

I have 2 questions:

1. The NIP was served correctly, but the constabulary took 20 days between 29/10 and 18/11 to serve the NIP on the leaseholder - is this a problem?
2. How can I obtain further location information on the camera that recorded this, as I do not recall any signage to notify me of the presence of a camera on this road (although it was a long road).

Many thanks, and kind regards,

5
Thanks John and apologies, vehicle reg: ND73 FHL (Black Skoda).

GSV link: https://maps.app.goo.gl/ofWE6cBey6MoJAMi6

Kind regards, AceKingPin

6
Hello,

I have a feeling that I'm in the wrong here - but thought I'd post anyway. I parked in a designated disabled person's parking bay this Sunday evening at Lodge Place, Sutton, after 6.30 pm (there were about 8 bays and almost all were empty).

The signage read:

Disabled badge holders only
(separator)
8 am - 6.30 pm, 3 hours, No return within 2 hours
(separator)
At other times No limit

I took the separator to mean that after 6.30 pm that there was no limitation on any vehicle to park in this bay, which I thought was reinforced by the fact that there was a signage separator above it.

I've attached the PCN notice received. Do I have any case here, or should I pay the £70 (expensive mistake)?

As a grumble, this part of Sutton is a massive ring road, so you have to travel the entirety of if if you think you've missed a legitimate space - making it very hard to find parking on a Sunday evening (where you'd think roads after 6.30 pm on a Sunday are mostly free)

Many thanks and kind regards,

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

7
Hello all, I managed to get my PCN cancelled by Swindon council for the same reasons as @azuremumbai80 - by submitting the following representation:

"Dear Swindon Borough Council,

I believe that this PCN is invalid and must be cancelled because it does not comply with the mandatory requirements of regulation 3(2)(b) of The Civil Enforcement of Road Traffic Contraventions (Representations and Appeals) (England) Regulations 2022.

Procedural impropriety became one of the grounds upon which representations could be made under these 2022 regulations.

The PCN's page for representations lists the old 2005 regulations and doesn't contain the full list of statutory grounds for a representation.

I am also aware of a successful challenge at Tribunal in relation to case number SI00031-2411, PCN # SI72804603, where the above challenge was upheld by Adjudicator Robinson on 11/12/24. I attach the adjudicator's decision here.

I therefore request that Swindon Council cancel this PCN to save time for everyone involved."

Thank you to @Incandescent and @cp8759 for your awareness of these elements, it is a great help.

8
Hello all, I managed to get my PCN cancelled by Swindon council for the same reasons as @azuremumbai80 - by submitting the following representation:

"Dear Swindon Borough Council,

I believe that this PCN is invalid and must be cancelled because it does not comply with the mandatory requirements of regulation 3(2)(b) of The Civil Enforcement of Road Traffic Contraventions (Representations and Appeals) (England) Regulations 2022.

Procedural impropriety became one of the grounds upon which representations could be made under these 2022 regulations.

The PCN's page for representations lists the old 2005 regulations and doesn't contain the full list of statutory grounds for a representation.

I am also aware of a successful challenge at Tribunal in relation to case number SI00031-2411, PCN # SI72804603, where the above challenge was upheld by Adjudicator Robinson on 11/12/24. I attach the adjudicator's decision here.

I therefore request that Swindon Council cancel this PCN to save time for everyone involved."

Thank you to @Incandescent and @cp8759 for your awareness of these elements, it is a great help.

9
That's great news - thank you for confirming.

If I may ask @azuremumbai80 - is there a case number you are willing to share that I can quote on my initial response to Swindon council regarding your citation of the procedural error and the adjudicator's outcome - which might help me in my case?

I have the same format PCN as the one you submitted, so think my case is in scope for the same grounds to contest this.

Many thanks.

10
Good luck with your hearing on Friday - I'm interested in your outcome as I am in the same situation.

I've only been at a hearing once before and am not a lawyer, but I would say you should know the legal statute you are using, and maybe prepare by considering likely counter arguments by the council and your response to those?

11
Thank you @Incandescent for your advice.

Based on what I'm reading the practice of using multiple PCN references whilst the PCN works its way through to owner (leasing company) to hirer (me) is normal and not a reason to challenge.

The most recent PCN does have my details on it, whilst the earlier ones sent to the leasing company have theirs on it.

As I don't see much by way of compelling arguments for appeal in relation to Penzance Drive on this forum, I'm going to pay the reduced fine.

Many thanks again.

12
Hello,

I'm a recipient of a PCN from Swindon, code 34J, Being in a Bus Lane - Penzance Drive, on 27/10/24 at 10:19:07.

PCN # [There are 3 for some unknown reason]: SI72816908 (issued 11/11/24 via leasing company), SI7282567A (issued 27/11/24 via leasing company), SI72837340 (issued 03/12/24 direct by post) VRN #: ND73FHL

My timeline as follows:

1. The car is a leased car, so I received email notice of this PCN (SI72816908) on 11/11/24 from our leasing company
2. I checked https://ww6.swindon.gov.uk/SBCEpay/pcn/pages/getdetails.aspx and https://parking.swindon.gov.uk/Pages/OnlineFormalRep.aspx on 20/11/24 regarding the PCN, and found that £0 was due. I took a screenshot of each of the 2 websites confirming £0 was owing [I can provide on this post if required]
3. I phoned Swindon council around 20/11/24, and the agent confirmed £0 was owing. I don't have proof of this other than the phone bill of the call
4. I was chased again by the leasing company on 27/11/24. I didn't know it at the time, but the PCN changed to SI7282567A
5. I checked https://ww6.swindon.gov.uk/SBCEpay/pcn/pages/getdetails.aspx once again, which again showed £0 was owing
6. I then receive the postal PCN on 05/12/24, with yet again a new PCN # SI72837340. This one is active on the council website.

Do I have any case regarding the way I have been served this notice by the council, with 3x PCNs - 2 of which say £0 on the council website plus my phone call to them with an agent confirming the same?

Otherwise my inclination is to pay the £35 fine within 21 days.

I've also read the thread on https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/pcn-swindon-borough-council-bus-lane/msg41636/ for another poster on this forum, so can provide full copies of the PCN photos if necessary.

Many thanks, AceKingPin

13
Thanks to @cp8759 for representing me and successfully arguing my case. Sadly the council have now improved the lighting from what it was at, at the time of the PCN.

But I'd say that their inability to provide key information (such as CCTV and original appeal text) within a reasonable time-frame could make them liable as well, given the 12th March misleading around keeping the discount on hold (when it wasn't)

14
Hello @cp8759, I've just received the evidence pack in which my original challenge text was finally provided to me:

"Q: Please describe why you want to challenge the penalty charge notice
A: The lighting around the area and insufficient illumination of signage in advance of approaching the bus lane are the main reasons.
I was driving the vehicle at a time where street lighting was off, and I veered into the left lane assuming it was the safest lane to travel with and being uncertain whether the right lane represented a fork to force me to turn right. I didn't see adequate signage when approaching the lane (I don't think street lighting and signing was lit) that there was a restriction in that lane. I only realised after I saw the double dashed lines that gave way to the right lane traffic that I may have been in the wrong lane. But further to not seeing any visible signage on my approach, I was not aware that the validity of it extended to after midnight either. I thought it was safer for me to continue to proceed rather than reverse my car and then move to the right lane."

I would like to ask if you would be prepared to represent or assist me in this matter at all? My wife is the registered keeper and I was the driver at the time of the contravention, which has been recorded.

I'm happy to request switching the hearing to a telephone hearing as required, and I would maintain that I should still be allowed the discounted £65 rate given my earlier email submission and the council's failure to provide me with the above evidence text in time.

15
Hello @cp8759, I received the following in writing:

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

So I genuinely thought the discount would remain active. This response is contrary to the screenshot you've sent, and to me, it seems unfair and that I've been misled in this process.

[ Guests cannot view attachments ]

Pages: [1] 2 3