3. TFL N244 Form from congestion Charge PCN
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: TFL N244 Form from congestion Charge PCN  (Read 235 times)

0 Members and 42 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: TFL N244 Form from congestion Charge PCN
« Reply #15 on: »
Escalating a complaint to TFL outside of the process could also be an option.
Logged
Re: TFL N244 Form from congestion Charge PCN
« Reply #16 on: »
Quote from: stamfordman on May 08, 2026, 10:24:34 am
Escalating a complaint to TFL outside of the process could also be an option.

And that is exactly what I would be suggesting.
Logged
Re: TFL N244 Form from congestion Charge PCN
« Reply #17 on: »
CP8759 seemed to believe that he could get such costs covered/reclaimed.

I recall from about a year+ ago.
Logged
Re: TFL N244 Form from congestion Charge PCN
« Reply #18 on: »
I promptly wrote back to TFL stating this was not an application for 3rd party representation and explaining that we have moved premises since the PCN were issued and can all correspondence go to the new address. I have proof of postage / tracking and a copy of this letter.

OP, where is this letter pl.
Logged
Re: TFL N244 Form from congestion Charge PCN
« Reply #19 on: »
Quote from: Neil B on May 08, 2026, 03:42:24 pm
CP8759 seemed to believe that he could get such costs covered/reclaimed.

I recall from about a year+ ago.
It's possible in principle but it would have to be a very clear-cut case where the enforcement authority is demonstrably at fault.
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Re: TFL N244 Form from congestion Charge PCN
« Reply #20 on: »
UPDATE:

Having now read all of the documents, I could see where there had been some confusion.

The OP's company had moved address and only became aware of PCN's in late May 2025 when contacted by occupiers at the previous address.

On 6th June 2025, The Director of the company (the OP making this thread), contacted TfL via their website to advise that they had moved address (new address also provided). TfL refer to this communication as being 'representation'. As the Director was not the Respondent, TfL sent a '3rd party authorisation to both the current and previous address. The Director responded on 1st July 2025 on company headed correspondence (carrying the current business address) stating again that they had moved address.

TfL confirmed receipt but then did something daft. They issued a Notice of Rejection to the 'representation' and sent this document to the PREVIOUS address.

Four months later, and despite being notified twice (on 6th June and 1st July) that the company had moved address, TfL progressed the matter to debt registration and the issue of Orders for Recovery followed by warrants of control....all to the previous address.

To be clear, the company had updated their Log Book shortly after being aware of the PCN's.

Correspondence was sent to TfL citing the landmark Court of Appeal case of Carr v Vehicle Control Services (2025). 

TfL have been exceptionally helpful and confirmed today that they had cancelled all the PCN's.

Bailiff Advice Online
   
Logged
Re: TFL N244 Form from congestion Charge PCN
« Reply #21 on: »
Wow, "exceptionally helpful" ! Is this a first ? Or do you have special powers of which we know nothing; a force field maybe !

Many thanks for the help and information, it is much appreciated.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  3. TFL N244 Form from congestion Charge PCN