PCN;
informal reps made on 29th June;
"Dear Sir or Madam,
On-line challenge for JK19598383
On the grounds of:
The PCN exceeded the amount applicable
Further explanation :
Hello there, I wish to make representations relating to PCN JK19598383, issued on 23rd June 2026 at 09.40
I was visiting
name redacted at
house number redacted Amelia St., SE17 3AS on the day, he told me he had activated a parking session
for my vehicle as he had also done on the previous day (22nd June). However on this day he entered the wrong
VRN, LG69BXA instead of LG69BXF.
As a session had been paid for, albeit for the wrong vehicle, the Council was not out-of-pocket financially on this
occasion. I was of the belief that a valid session was active regarding my vehicle, especially as a valid session
was activated by
name redacted the previous day, I would have thought previous VRNs would show up on the software,
ready to be clicked on.
I feel I am being penalised, through no fault of my own, for an honest mistake by another, and for an amount
which is disproportionate to the situation considering that the council were already paid for parking.
I ask you to please look into cancelling the PCN this time.
Best Regards"
Their reply;
streetview;
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
Hello all, first time on this site, but a frequent flier on pepipoo.
So they think that the person I visited activated a pay by phone parking session, but it was a visitor's permit.
Reading my reps I can see how they may have thought this, but why they didn't check whether a permit was in place for the wrong VRN on the day, and my VRN on the day before, is beyond me.
Wondering whether to try and inform them of this by emailing the parking team, as I cannot challenge again online
