Author Topic: Wilts Council - Sadlers Mead Car Park - PCN Received - Paid for Parking on MiPermit but selected the wrong car park code  (Read 1154 times)

0 Members and 184 Guests are viewing this topic.

Good evening - I received a PCN whilst my car was parked in a council run car park on 17/12/24 and would appreciate some advice on how to proceed.

I parked on 17/12/24, and used Mi Permit to pay, leaving well before my expiry time.

Here's the issue:

The carpark consists of a multistory area, and outside that, stretching to approx 50m, a parking area with spaces for both cars and coaches. I parked in the outside area, in a car space. There is a sign giving the Mi Permit car park code (700108). See 3 images - car park entrance, layout and signage on the link below:

https://imgur.com/a/O5bvNpT

Street View:

https://maps.app.goo.gl/vtEW79Kszv6w1fvP6

Within the Mi Permit App, there is in fact 2 tags, 1 for cars and one for coaches. the 'Cars Tag' (700108) is geographically situated on the multistory area, and the 'Coaches Tag' (710108) is geographically placed some 50m away in the outside parking area.

https://imgur.com/a/6uuQ4Gf

Not realising the above, I selected the tag which was in the position I was parked (710108) and being only 1 digit different to the sign, I didn't notice.

So in summary, I paid for a coach, not a car.

The cost was £2.40 for up to 4 hours (I stayed for about 1hr 40mins).

https://imgur.com/a/YffTzVF

If I had selected the other tag, some 50m away from where I was parked, which is for cars, I would have paid £1.70 for up to 2 hours.

I recieved the following PCN:

https://imgur.com/a/8jJD1Oa

I have appealed using the online process, explaining all of the above in detail but and my appeal has been rejected as follows:

https://imgur.com/a/mB7pzMF

The rejection response also had a photo of the Pay and display machine and signage, which I think is in the multi-story section of the car park, and does seem to have some T&Cs on it. I never went into the multi-story, so never saw this, and the outside signage doesn't have any T&Cs printed.

The Mi-Permit receipt did state "Sadlers Mead Car Park (Coaches)" which whilst I didn't notice at the time, doesn't seem entirely strange considering I was in a car parking space within a coach parking area. Ambiguous perhaps.

I think that the way the app is setup is ambiguous and having 2 codes so similar has lead to a genuine mistake that actually resulted in me paying a higher charge than I could have done, but to not recognize this seems somewhat unfair.

Any advice on how to proceed would be appreciated! thank you.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2025, 11:46:23 pm by silveraudi »

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Welcome to FTLA.

To help us provide the best advice, please read the following thread carefully and provide as much of the information it asks for as you are able to: READ THIS FIRST - Private Parking Charges Forum guide

thanks, I'll edit my original post with the extra information.

Original post now modified with all the documents attached as links. Thank you.

This is a council PCN, not a private parking charge notice, so I have moved this post to the Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) forum.

To help the users there provide you with the best advice, please read the following thread carefully and provide as much of the information it requests as you are able to: READ THIS FIRST - **BEFORE POSTING YOUR CASE!**, This section is for council, TFL, Dart/Mersey/Tyne etc. cases - the information required is slightly different with council PCNs, so you should read this guide even if you have already read the private parking one.

This is a council PCN, not a private parking charge notice, so I have moved this post to the Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on) forum.

To help the users there provide you with the best advice, please read the following thread carefully and provide as much of the information it requests as you are able to: READ THIS FIRST - **BEFORE POSTING YOUR CASE!**, This section is for council, TFL, Dart/Mersey/Tyne etc. cases - the information required is slightly different with council PCNs, so you should read this guide even if you have already read the private parking one.

Thanks - I have made the relevant edits  :)

OK, lots of useful info, but you haven't shown us the sign with the location number for coaches parking that you mistakenly used. If this sign refers to coaches parking you will struggle, but if it doesn't you are in with a chance. We also need to know exactly where you parked in photographic terms and the nearest sign to that.

Also be aware that councils reject virtually all informal challenges, because they know that most people then just cough-up to get the discount. People are far too accepting that councils know what they are doing, the plain fact is most of them haven't a clue, based on experience of this forum !

OK, lots of useful info, but you haven't shown us the sign with the location number for coaches parking that you mistakenly used. If this sign refers to coaches parking you will struggle, but if it doesn't you are in with a chance. We also need to know exactly where you parked in photographic terms and the nearest sign to that.

Also be aware that councils reject virtually all informal challenges, because they know that most people then just cough-up to get the discount. People are far too accepting that councils know what they are doing, the plain fact is most of them haven't a clue, based on experience of this forum !

Thanks for your reply. I don't know where it is, I'll need to go back and look. The only reason I used the wrong code wasn't because of the signage in the carpark, but because the Mi Permit app places the the coaches option over the car park I parked in, and the cars option over the multi-story carpark approx. 50m away - See below:

https://imgur.com/a/6uuQ4Gf

Natural instinct was to select the option closest to where I was parked (in fact, right on top of where I was parked!). Is there any argument around this, or am I best to just pay and get done with it ?

I have appealed using the online process, explaining all of the above in detail

I suspect a bit too much!

Anyway, let's break this down.

The alleged contravention is not for driving a car and not a coach, or not paying(irrespective of location codes) or parking in an area not designated for your class of vehicle, it is for not displaying a P&D ticket or voucher.
But you paid online, so it's impossible to display and there cannot be a requirement to display, therefore the contravention did not occur...

..unless where you parked has clear Ts and Cs to the contrary.

So, pl forget about payment, whether you're a coach or car etc...we need to see the Ts and Cs board which applied to where you were parked pl.

So my reading of what happened is that you did not view any car park conditions boards at all, but relied on the Mi Permit app on your phone to present to you on your mobile screen where the parking locations are and their location numbers. It uses satnav to do this and works in a similar way to Ringo on my own phone. So your app should have told you that the location you used was for coaches only; did it ?

Here in Nantwich we have two car parks very close together and one must make sure the correct one is chosen on the map shown on one's mobile phone. So in my opinion, much depends on what Mi Permit showed you to select from in order to pay for parking.

My view is that you have a reasonably good case, because the app is confusing by showing a number by where you parked, whereas it should really display two numbers there, one for cars parked in car spaces, and one for coaches

So despite their usual Fob-Off letter, I would take this all the way to adjudication and risk the full PCN penalty, but it's your decision.

I have appealed using the online process, explaining all of the above in detail

I suspect a bit too much!

Anyway, let's break this down.

The alleged contravention is not for driving a car and not a coach, or not paying(irrespective of location codes) or parking in an area not designated for your class of vehicle, it is for not displaying a P&D ticket or voucher.
But you paid online, so it's impossible to display and there cannot be a requirement to display, therefore the contravention did not occur...

..unless where you parked has clear Ts and Cs to the contrary.

So, pl forget about payment, whether you're a coach or car etc...we need to see the Ts and Cs board which applied to where you were parked pl.

Thanks for your reply. I did wonder about the contravention definition. Seems odd. I'll get a copy of the T&C's board later today.

So my reading of what happened is that you did not view any car park conditions boards at all, but relied on the Mi Permit app on your phone to present to you on your mobile screen where the parking locations are and their location numbers. It uses satnav to do this and works in a similar way to Ringo on my own phone.

Thanks for your reply. To answer your first point - Yes, I relied on the app (stupidly) and selected the one that was where I was parked. Because its only one digit different to the code on the sign, I didn't notice. The image below is what Mi Permit presents (with my annotations in red):

https://imgur.com/a/6uuQ4Gf

In using the app, I should have selected the carpark location some 50m away from where I was parked, not the one that was directly where I was parked.

So your app should have told you that the location you used was for coaches only; did it ?

The image below is what it shows when you select the carpark I was in, whilst parked in a legitimate car parking space:

https://imgur.com/a/P0OO1e1

It has (coaches) in brackets at the end, which I didn't notice, however I was in the coach park area of a car park so might not have seemed entirely odd.


My view is that you have a reasonably good case, because the app is confusing by showing a number by where you parked, whereas it should really display two numbers there, one for cars parked in car spaces, and one for coaches

So despite their usual Fob-Off letter, I would take this all the way to adjudication and risk the full PCN penalty, but it's your decision.

I agree - as it stands, the tag I should have selected was quite some distance from where I was parked, which I don't believe is very intuitive.

Thanks for your advice.

...everything except the Ts and Cs board applicable to where you were.

No amount of narrative and references to a permit app which might be irrelevant can substitute IMO.

So you paid more than you should have done to park in a car space owing to a footling location code issue in an app? I presume the app isn't bright enough to reconcile your car VRM with vehicle type.

Yes the t&c's are important but really this is a poor show by the council and I would go on with this. I think an adjudicator would side with you.

Good Evening and thanks for the replies so far.

I went and found the T&Cs board that's closest to where I parked - see below:

https://imgur.com/a/nxIy7B0

I also searched for the sign that shows the coaches code (710108), and I'm fairly sure it doesn't exist. The only way to find that code is via the app.

PS - Maybe I should have parked like these cars have:

https://imgur.com/a/jb2kNyk

!!
« Last Edit: January 08, 2025, 09:28:48 pm by silveraudi »