Author Topic: PCN 53J Failing to comply with restrictions on vehicles entering a pedestrian zone (Camera enforcement) - Barking  (Read 353 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Helpme101

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: August 05, 2024, 11:56:54 pm by Helpme101 »

Incandescent

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2300
  • Karma: +55/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Crewe
    • View Profile

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1637
  • Karma: +17/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
B and D should refer it to the Tribunal.
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ

Helpme101

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
https://postimg.cc/Js9hcNqb

That’s a good point 😭😭! Please see attached.

Also I just realised I did not blank out the letter in the original link.

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1637
  • Karma: +17/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
B and D should refer it to the Tribunal.


Sorry this may be wrong advice as I do  not know what you said on the Statutory Declaration form.
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ

Helpme101

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Hey! I just ticked the part which said I never recived pcn. Would B&D have to send a new Pcn then?

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1637
  • Karma: +17/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
Hey! I just ticked the part which said I never recived pcn. Would B&D have to send a new Pcn then?

2)The statutory declaration must state that the person making it—
(a)did not receive the penalty charge notice in question;

(9)Service of a declaration under sub-paragraph (2)(a) above shall not prevent the enforcing authority serving a fresh penalty charge notice but if, when it was served, the relevant order under paragraph 6 was accompanied by a copy of the penalty charge notice to which the charge certificate relates, a fresh penalty charge notice in the same terms shall be deemed to have been served on the person making the declaration on the same day as the declaration was served.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/schedule/1/enacted
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ

Helpme101

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Okayy! So should I call up b&D and see if they are still going to chase me. Or should I wait for another pcn in the post?

What if I wait again but the pcn isn’t sent or letter gets “lost” in the post?

Helpme101

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Hey! I just ticked the part which said I never recived pcn. Would B&D have to send a new Pcn then?

2)The statutory declaration must state that the person making it—
(a)did not receive the penalty charge notice in question;

(9)Service of a declaration under sub-paragraph (2)(a) above shall not prevent the enforcing authority serving a fresh penalty charge notice but if, when it was served, the relevant order under paragraph 6 was accompanied by a copy of the penalty charge notice to which the charge certificate relates, a fresh penalty charge notice in the same terms shall be deemed to have been served on the person making the declaration on the same day as the declaration was served.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/schedule/1/enacted

Boosting as I haven’t had a response yet

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1637
  • Karma: +17/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
What happened with the TEC application?
« Last Edit: August 25, 2024, 08:34:40 pm by Hippocrates »
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ

Helpme101

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 27
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
What happened with the TEC application?

The order of recovery was revoked and charge certificate cancelled

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1637
  • Karma: +17/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
So just sit tight and do not contact them.
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know through no fault of their own.

"Hippocrates"

ἔοικα γοῦν τούτου γε σμικρῷ τινι αὐτῷ τούτῳ σοφώτερος εἶναι, ὅτι ἃ μὴ οἶδα οὐδὲ οἴομαι εἰ