Author Topic: Brent/Code 53 (Failure to Comply with a restriction for pedestrian zone )/Perrin Rd  (Read 62 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

mrd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Merrily driving along Watford Road and had the misfortune of entering a zone that is restricted at particular times. I went back and was disappointed that the signage is facing you as you turn in (giving you very little notice of changing course).
I am attaching pictures and hope there is recourse here. Please help.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter


Incandescent

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1059
  • Karma: +27/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Crewe
    • View Profile
GSV no good here, as it's out-of-date, (Oct 2022). Di you turn left or right into Perrin Road. Are there any advance signs ? If not you might have an appeal argument. However, your photo shows three signs, one positioned for drivers turning left into the road. If you turned right, the signs would be clearly visible to you.

Anyway, post up the video.  Did you just carry on up Perrin Road or turn round ?

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 735
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
Issue with sate of service in parenthesis. The rest of the PCN please.
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know.

"Hippocrates"

mrd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
@Incandescent - Thanks for your reply. Does GSV stand for Google Street View? I turned right into Perrin Road. There weren't any advanced signs. If you turn right with no oncoming traffic, there is nowhere near enough time to take in all the signage. Given, you might also be conscious of emergent oncoming traffic.

Here's a link to images and video: https://viewmypcn.co.uk/default.aspx?r=4aedda1e50f24baa0adea1a29f662bcf225baec5

I carried on up Perrin Road.

mrd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
@Hippocrates - Sorry I'm not aware ofthe lexicon here. What do you mean by 'sate of service'? Here's the rest of the PCN.

Hippocrates

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 735
  • Karma: +10/-0
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: The Cosmos.
    • View Profile
My typo: date of service.

Draft:

The PCN is unenforceable because:

1. The statement in  parenthesis concerning the date of service  causes confusion and ambiguity in terms of my understanding of the statement immediately preceding it.

2. The taken without consent  ground clearly limits to theft and therefore does not correctly express the statutory ground because a relative or friend may have taken the vehicle without consent, which does not necessitate an obligation to report such circumstance to the Police or, indeed, make an insurance claim.

3. The signage is most confusing by its plurality and there was no sufficient advanced signage of the restriction.

In view of the above, please cancel the PCN

Name (registered keeper)

Address
« Last Edit: February 10, 2024, 03:07:22 pm by Hippocrates »
There are known knowns which, had we known, we would never have wished to know. It is known that this also applies to the known unknowns. However, when one attends a hearing, Mr Rumsfeld's idea that there are also unknown unknowns fails to apply because, anyone who is in the know, knows that unknown unknowns are purely a deception otherwise known as an aleatory experience or also known as a lottery. I know that I know this to be a fact and, in this knowledge, I know that I am fully prepared to present my case but, paradoxically, in full knowledge that the unknown unknowns may well apply in view of some adjudicators' lack of knowing what they ought to know.

"Hippocrates"

mrd

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
@Hippocrates - Many thanks for drafting this response. I have written to LB Brent and will update here with their reply.