3. 52m Haringey - 3 PCNs in a week
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: 52m Haringey - 3 PCNs in a week  (Read 2020 times)

0 Members and 40 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: 52m Haringey - 3 PCNs in a week
« Reply #15 on: »
Also, on the original PCN it states " If the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the date of service of this notice, an increased charge of £195.00 maybe payable."

Under serction 4(8)(a)(v) it states as follows :that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the 28 day period, an increased charge may be payable;

Is their a Difference in "maybe" and "may be" which would add to the invalidity?
« Last Edit: December 05, 2025, 12:02:25 am by cp8759 »
Logged
Re: 52m Haringey - 3 PCNs in a week
« Reply #16 on: »
Quote from: harry91 on April 28, 2025, 08:40:22 pm
Thanx for getting back to me, not really understanding what you are saying though sorry for my ignorance.

I should contest all 3 via adjudicator? And my argument should be based on the adam jones vs Havering ruling?

If you dont mind can you explain more?

Yes all three. Not the Adam Jones decision  but the other Haringey case won some months ago. Appeal filed.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2025, 11:52:28 am by Hippocrates »
Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: 52m Haringey - 3 PCNs in a week
« Reply #17 on: »
Won on signage.
Logged
I REGRET THAT, FOR THE PRESENT, I AM UNABLE TO TAKE ON ANY MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. THIS IS FOR BOTH PERSONAL AND LEGAL REASONS. PLEASE DO NOT PM ME UNLESS YOU HAVE POSTED YOUR THREAD ON THE FORUM AND I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE ADVICE.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: 52m Haringey - 3 PCNs in a week
« Reply #18 on: »
Outcome.

Please remember to tick the "Don't use smileys" box under "Attachments and other options" when referring certain well-known parts of the London Local Authorities and Transport for London Act 2003.
Logged
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
Pages: 1 [2]
« previous next »
  3. 52m Haringey - 3 PCNs in a week