Author Topic: Parking Eye / DCB Legal Court Claim – Charge Was Supposedly Cancelled  (Read 160 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

4 - should only reference 'hirer of the vehicle' - remove the word 'user'.

9 - should only reference a NtH - remove the NtK bit as a parking operator can only issue a NtH once the lease company have supplied the hirers details - there is no facility under POFA to issue a second NtK in the hirer's name.

6 - ditto above.

Also, introduce a line space between each defence points - Judge's do like a wall of words - keep them happy with spacing!
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 03:11:42 pm by InterCity125 »

Thanks so much, I've made the relevant changes.

To play devils advocate, what happens if PE did issue me the correct letter? Like I've said I don't recall receiving it but I assume they will need to provide evidence also, so if the correct letter is provided by them how would that affect my defence? Is it worth including anything relating to my original defence around the supposed cancellation? Or is it a stronger case to stick with this route?

Any advice on the next steps would be great too please, re: the Acknowledging of service and entering my defence for review? Can someone explain what will happen please as I'm unsure of the process and next steps, what it actually entails?

TIA

That's not a defence IMO.

Your defence is as I posted.

You were not the driver;
You were not the keeper.

The rest goes into your witness statement IMO.

Do not take weight of evidence literally and try and make the judge's life easy.

Ok thanks.
So I now acknowledge the service and literally just add those 2 points to my defence?

What is the process then if you don’t mind me asking, do I wait to see if the decision is to get it dismissed? And if not it would proceed to mitigation and that’s when I provide a witness statement?
If you could shed some light on the process that would be great please.
TIA