Reply #90 on: January 04, 2024, 03:23:59 pm
#91
Don't mention the camera issue. They have a new certificate, but there's more to it than that. Can't say more for now.
With hindsight it was a good idea to do so because their responses constitute bolleaux. Unbelievable! And from a council who really should know better! Still, our hobby continues as do the jobs for the people in Nottingham et alia.
The Witness Statement of B Main refers to Parking Legislation 2007.
I further certify:1. that this/these was/were produced in accordance with the Code of Practice for the Operation of CCTV Enforcement cameras.2. that the monitoring and recording equipment used at the location and time specified is an approved device under Article 2 of the Civil Enforcement of Parking & Traffic Contraventions (Approved Devices) (England) Order 2007.3. that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, all conditions subject to which approval was given were satisfied. 
Said person should be issued with another kind of certificate viz. P45.
Last Edit: January 04, 2024, 08:30:04 pm by Hippocrates
Logged
@Incandescent!
I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.
If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".
cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"
There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.
To Socrates from "Hippocrates"