+1.
OP, for the sake of this exercise let's accept and welcome that PCN ***1276A was served.
My thoughts.
Grounds
Penalty exceeded the amount applicable ....
The council's records show that:
A PCN was served on my car at 09.08 on 19 Aug. for the alleged contravention of Code 40 ******(PCN no. ********);
At 10.10 another PCN was served on my car (*****1276A)for the same contravention;
In the interim my car did not move.
The council removed my car at *****;
I recovered my car at *** and was required to pay £*** comprising £** for the removal and £*** for the discounted penalty in respect of PCN ****1276A.
It must be immediately apparent to the council that as I was required to pay the relevant charges in accordance with s101A(3) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and as removal is only lawful, inter alia, in respect of:
101A(3)(a)any penalty charge payable in respect of the parking of the vehicle in the place from which it was removed,'
then it follows that if no such penalty was payable then the removal was unlawful and 'relevant charges' could not be demanded.
As the PCN relied upon was *****1276A, that is to say a PCN issued on the same day and within 1 hour of a previous PCN, then removal predicated upon PCN 1276A was unlawful and no penalty or other charges could be demanded.