Skip to content
Free Traffic Legal Advice
Login Register

PCN: FR6269160 - Contravention 624 Waltham Forest

788 Views 11 Replies

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

« previous next »
Pages: [1]
PCN: FR6269160 - Contravention 624 Waltham Forest
on:
#1
Received a PCN

Link to PCN and Photos here:
 
PCN Pics - Google Drive
Google Drive · drive.google.com


Received on Davies Lane E11 in Waltham Forest on 14th July  (out of date Google Street View) here:
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps. · maps.app.goo.gl


Appealing that this was not a pavement as there was no

- indicators it was a pavement
- no signs to say no parking
- no double yellow lines
Logged
Re: PCN: FR6269160 - Contravention 624 Waltham Forest
Reply #1 on:
#2
DYL do not matter as pavement parking is prohibited in London by statutory regulation so no signs are needed but as you say it does not look like you may be anywhere else other than the carriageway.

Can you get some up to date photos of the location?
Logged
Re: PCN: FR6269160 - Contravention 624 Waltham Forest
Reply #4 on:
#5
I'll draft something later. Photos are on the website link.
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: PCN: FR6269160 - Contravention 624 Waltham Forest
Reply #5 on:
#6
Self-evidently GSV shows that the council treated this area as being carriageway as recently as 2 years ago. Whether an area is deemed to be carriageway or footway is a matter of law, not surface treatment. The authority must therefore prove by way of council decisions that the legal status of this area has been changed and that it is now footway and not carriageway.
Logged
Agree Agree x 1 View List
Re: PCN: FR6269160 - Contravention 624 Waltham Forest
Reply #7 on:
#8
Dear Council

I challenge PCN as follows:

1. Contravention did not occur: The place I was parked is in my view carriageway.

2. Procedural Impropriety:

Furthermore, the PCN itself contains a procedural error that invalidates it. Schedule 2 paragraph 2 states
(d)that the penalty charge must be paid within the period of 28 days beginning with the date on which the alleged contravention occurred,

However, the PCN I received states that payment is due within 28 days from the date of service, not the date of the alleged contravention. This discrepancy constitutes a procedural impropriety that renders the PCN invalid.

In light of the above, please cancel the PCN

Registered Keeper

Address
Last Edit: July 26, 2024, 04:07:24 pm by Hippocrates
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: PCN: FR6269160 - Contravention 624 Waltham Forest
Reply #8 on:
#9
Add GSV from 2 years ago and say that if your assertion as regards the status of this part of the road is incorrect and the council have changed its status from what was self-evidently carriageway, then the authority must provide proof(and not merely assert) to this effect e.g. decision of the Traffic Authority etc.
Logged
Re: PCN: FR6269160 - Contravention 624 Waltham Forest
Reply #10 on:
#11
Please show what you wrote.
Logged
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
Re: PCN: FR6269160 - Contravention 624 Waltham Forest
Reply #11 on:
#12
I chose the contravention didn’t occur

Gave below reason

Self-evidently GSV shows that the council treated this area as being carriageway as recently as 2 years ago. Whether an area is deemed to be carriageway or footway is a matter of law, not surface treatment. The authority must therefore prove by way of council decisions that the legal status of this area has been changed and that it is now footway and not carriageway.

Uploaded pics
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »