Skip to content

PCN 53j given because i had to pick my son with additional needs!

5392 Views 59 Replies

0 Members and 73 Guests are viewing this topic.

#47
When I received the PCN notice, I was able to view a video clip of the alleged offence. Is that considered the full extent of the evidence, or should I expect to receive additional evidence?
Apologies if my question seems basic.

Thank you for all your time and effort. Really appreciate each and everyone of you.
#53
Hi
I hope you’re all well
I received 2 evidence packs this morning. Could one of you kindly advise on what to do with these please?
Thank you
PM me the case number, verification code and VRM so I can take a look.
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
#54
I have had a look. The cases should be able for all to access.

1, An apology from them in cases summary. No time to copy out at present.
2. Photos aren't that helpful in their evidence.
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
#56
Hello

So I’m writing to express my deepest gratitude for your support in helping me appeal my PCNs — and I’m thrilled to let you know that the authorities have now officially cancelled both PCNs

What makes this even more meaningful is the fact that you offered your help completely free of charge. Your generosity, dedication, and expertise made a stressful situation so much more manageable, and I can’t thank you enough for that.

Beyond the outcome, your commitment to helping others has truly inspired me. It’s rare to come across people who give their time and energy so selflessly, and your example has left a lasting impression on me.

Thank you again for everything you’ve done — not just for me, but for everyone you support. Please keep up the amazing work
Like Like x 1 View List
#57
Ms Pearce was the adjudicator, case 2250139149

This Appeal was initially Heard by me on 29th May 2025, on which occasion after examining the evidence adduced by the Enforcement Authority and considering the representations made on behalf of the Appellant, I made a finding of compelling mitigation.

I therefore Adjourned the matter to afford the Enforcement Authority an opportunity of reconsidering the mitigating circumstances.

I am now in receipt of the Enforcement Authority's response and accept the Enforcement Authority's indication that it is not proceeding further with Penalty Charge Notice BZ81519314.

Accordingly, this Appeal is Allowed.
I am currently too busy working to take on any except the most unreasonable PCNs.

I help you pro bono (for free). I now ask that a £40 donation is made to the North London Hospice before I take over your case. I have an 85% success rate across 2,000 PCNs but some PCNs can't be beaten and I will tell you if your case looks hopeless before asking you to donate.
#58
This is the case referencing both.

Two thoughts.

1. Lucky to get Ms Pearce.

2. Adjudicators can make recommendations to cancel (for parking PCNs not moving traffic) where they are obviously exasperated with the authority's lack of fairness but I haven't see one punted back like this before a decision, on compelling mitigation. Maybe this the way round the bar on recommendations for this type of PCN.   

----------

2250139262

Th Appeal of Penalty Charge Notice BZ81519314 was Heard by me on 29th May 2025, on which occasion I examined evidence adduced by the Enforcement Authority and considered representations made on behalf of the Appellant, which were ad idem with the Appeal of Penalty Charge Notice BZ81554290.

I made a finding of compelling mitigation in respect of both Penalty Charge Notices.

I therefore Adjourned the matter to afford the Enforcement Authority an opportunity of reconsidering the mitigating circumstances.

I am now in receipt of the Enforcement Authority's response and accept that the Enforcement Authority's indication that it is not proceeding further with Penalty Charge Notice
BZ81519314 includes Penalty Charge Notice BZ81554290.

Accordingly, this Appeal is Allowed.
Last Edit: June 12, 2025, 01:28:49 pm by stamfordman
Dislike Dislike x 1 View List
#59
Only one of them has, so far, been cancelled on the council portal despite the Appeals being allowed for both.
I am currently too busy working to take on any except the most unreasonable PCNs.

I help you pro bono (for free). I now ask that a £40 donation is made to the North London Hospice before I take over your case. I have an 85% success rate across 2,000 PCNs but some PCNs can't be beaten and I will tell you if your case looks hopeless before asking you to donate.