Skip to content

Greenwich - Code 624 one or more wheels over footpath - John Harrison Way

19484 Views 82 Replies

0 Members and 328 Guests are viewing this topic.

#31
My hearing date is Wednesday 2nd.

Do you mean Wednesday the 3rd?
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
#33

Thanks, what about this in their statement "The vehicle was parked on a vehicle crossover" I think this admits its not footpath.

Wrong.

In any event it's not a footpath, it's a footway.

A vehicle crossover does what it says on the tin: it crosses the footway, it is constructed so as to allow motor vehicles to cross the footway without occasioning damage, an action that would otherwise be prohibited.

Like Like x 1 View List
#34
Personally, I would ask for an adjournment and ask one of us to represent you.  Probably cp or Mr Mustard.
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
#36
You received their pack today?

I have a hearing at 12.00 hrs which should be finished by 12.30.  Any problems, you can authorise me to act for you briefly, that is, merely to ask for the adjournment.  PM me if you accept. I have worked out when your case is because you left your personal details in one of the posts!

Madam/Sir, I only received the council's evidence pack on 31st December and so at the very least ask for an adjournment.  However, I am aware that a previous Chief Adjudicator, Martin Wood, issued a practice direction that in such circumstances my appeal should be allowed because I received it only 2 days before the hearing.
Last Edit: December 31, 2023, 08:43:28 pm by Hippocrates
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
#37
Please place this before the adjudicator as a matter of urgency.

As I only received the council’s evidence pack by post yesterday, I ask for an adjournment please.  I also note that the previous Chief Adjudicator at PATAS, Mr Martin Wood, issued a practice direction concerning such a situation which is mentioned in several decisions including the following in which the appeals were allowed:

Mr Anthony Davis v London Borough of Tower Hamlets Case No 2120451094; Mr Christopher Singh v London Borough of Bexley Case No 2130131442 and Ms Nicola Caskey v London Borough of Waltham Forest Case No 2130259672.  Furthermore, in Sinnathamby Chandrakumar v London Borough of Redbridge Case No 2140241334 the Adjudicator clearly stated that the principles and practices set out in the former PATAS manual of February 2009 are equally applicable to appeals to the ETA.

In view of this, I ask that the appeal be allowed.

Thank you for your consideration.

@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
#38
This is the NTO



The deemed date of service is  the 10th October, not the day it was delivered.
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
#39
Case adjourned.
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
#41
As discussed.  PM cp and Mr Mustard.  If they are not free, I will do it.  I have a hearing at 12.
Last Edit: January 03, 2024, 01:06:42 pm by Hippocrates
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
#42
@summer day I'm sorry I don't have any availability on that date. The only way I could represent you would be if the case were moved to some time in February.
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order
#43
@cp and Pastmybest and Mr Mustard:  what are the realistic chances of this succeeding.  I am there on the date and do not mind doing the job.
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"
#45
Thanks Not past your best!  I'll do the case as I am on record anyway.  You can e mail me it if you like.

Hippo New Year to you!  Great minds think alike as I was thinking this morning of e mailing you!
Last Edit: January 04, 2024, 08:21:39 pm by Hippocrates
@Incandescent!

I AM ABLE TO TAKE ON MORE CASES AS A REPRESENTATIVE AT THE LONDON TRIBUNALS. I HATE RETIREMENT.


If you do not challenge, you join "The Mugged Club".

cp8759 and mrmustard are true geniuses. I know my place in the hierarchy of The Three Musketeers. 😊 "The Clinician", "The Gentleman" and "The Showman"

There are "known knowns" which we may never have wished to know. This applies to them. But in the field the idea that there are also "unknown unknowns" doesn't apply as they hide in the aleatoric lottery. I know this is true and need to be prepared knowing the "unknown unknowns" may well apply.

To Socrates from "Hippocrates"