Camden - CA-F Stopped on a restricted bus stop/stand, Eversholt Street

I would add...

In the event that the authority rejects these representations and considers that I may be treated as the 'owner' for the purposes of the regulations, then it must provide proof that liability has been transferred correctly and include with any rejection copies of the following:

Representations from the registered keeper to the effect that they are a 'vehicle-hire firm';
The 'hiring agreement'(please note that this must include all details prescribed under the s66 Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988, as amended);
The signed statement of liability;
The authority's Notice of Acceptance.

Draft 2:

Dear Camden Council,

I was not the owner of the vehicle at the time. The vehicle was hired, and the PCN does not explain that it was sent to me as the hirer, nor does it include any documents showing that liability was transferred to me correctly.

For that reason, I ask that the PCN be cancelled.

In the event that the authority rejects these representations and considers that I may be treated as the 'owner' for the purposes of the regulations, then it must provide proof that liability has been transferred correctly and include with any rejection copies of the following:

Representations from the registered keeper to the effect that they are a 'vehicle-hire firm';
The 'hiring agreement'(this must include all details prescribed under the s66 Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988, as amended);
The signed statement of liability;
The authority's Notice of Acceptance.

Kind regards.

Fine by me.

I have received a response from the council, they have rejected my appeal.

Since i cannot use IMGUR anymore, as it is blocked in the UK, is there an alternative so i can post my letter here.

Thanks.

As Imgur is no longer available in the UK, you will need to please use
ibb.co or

for posting images.

Wherever possible, use the BBCode
--------------------------------------------
From Google AI (cannot vouch for accuracy! ) :

    AI Overview
    To use BBCode with an image from ImgPile, you need to get the direct link to your image and then format it using the . On ImgPile, you can find the "BBCode" option under the "Full Image" category to copy and paste the correct code directly, which is then used to display the image on forums and other platforms that support BBCode.
    Steps to use BBCode with ImgPile:

        Upload your image to ImgPile .
        Find the BBCode link: on ImgPile's sharing options.
            Look for a section with different embed codes, including "BBCode".
            Select the option for the full-size image if available.
        Copy the BBCode: provided by ImgPile.
        Paste the BBCode: into your post on a forum or platform that supports BBCode.

    Example:
    If the BBCode provided by ImgPile looks like (img width=433 height=287]https://imgpile.com/images/some-image.jpg[/img], then that is the exact code you would copy and paste into your post

It wouldn't show any bbcode, only a link to the website

Here is the direct image url:
https://cdn.imgpile.com/f/Sog0tX3.jpg

For convenience:

@H C Andersen

Any advise.

Thanks

Any advice on this please.

I only have 2 more days until the discount period expires.

Thanks

I have decided to pay, since I have not received any further advice.

This case can be closed.

Thanks

You're not the owner, or at least the authority have not produced proof to this effect.

This doesn't change simply because they say niet, it's a matter of proof and law.

If you want to pay, this is your choice.

You're not the owner, or at least the authority have not produced proof to this effect.

This doesn't change simply because they say niet, it's a matter of proof and law.

If you want to pay, this is your choice.

You are correct, i am not the owner and they have not provided any evidence of this.

But Respectfully, i have made multiple attempts to get further advice and PM you on this topic after i have received the rejection letter.

I did not want to pay, if i didn’t have to (which i did) but at the same time, if i had no advice to follow, what else could have i done in this position. So in this case i was better of paying the reduced rate instead of double.

Good decision. An adjudicator would not have looked kindly on the position you stopped in ay event.