Skip to content

Brent - 49J Parked wholly or partly on a cycle track CCTV enf. Walm Lane NW2

1755 Views 7 Replies

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

#2
We have another case here - I had a look at Maps and there is another sign further back I think, and the camera angle here is through the tree but the view from street level is probably OK.

And the video won't endear you to an adjudicator as a cyclist goes by...

Why did you stop there?

Also you have another one here incoming from Monday...

https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/cycle-lane-pcn-brent

Last Edit: February 04, 2026, 07:24:07 pm by stamfordman
#3
Stopped to enter a shop. Was parked for probably 3 minutes with my son in the car.

Yes I now of the other one. But I didn’t even stop, did not walk away from the car, engine on. I reversed onto a residents bay so I have already contested that. No idea how they can even issue the ticket.
#4
Stopped to enter a shop. Was parked for probably 3 minutes with my son in the car.

Yes I now of the other one. But I didn’t even stop, did not walk away from the car, engine on. I reversed onto a residents bay so I have already contested that. No idea how they can even issue the ticket.
Because they want your money.  Never, ever, think there is any morality and benevolence in London councils; there isn't !
#7
My view is No.
Adjudicators love to use the words "substantial compliance", and just missing those two words is unlikely to be considered a serious error. plus you parked over a clear white line, so should have looked for a sign. However, you have the legal right to appeal the matter at London Tribunals. If you win, you pay nothing. If you lose, you pay the full PCN penalty, but that is all, there are no other costs.