Clearly this thread, and the OP have both run their course.
Many years ago, I used to work with a very wise man called Dave. He had a number of stylised sayings and mottos, one of the few that I can post of a public forum was "Let it happen". Absent an applicable context, the wisdom of his advice might seem questionable, but the applicable context was always someone who of their own free will had decided to ignore perfectly sensible advice by pursuing a course of action which would invariably harm them and nobody else.
There is nothing wrong with knowing very little about a subject. I personally never got the hang of partial differential equations. Whether that was a failing on my part or the part of my maths teacher is open to debate, although he generally didn't understand the question, so my opinion on the matter is perhaps somewhat predictable.
Many OPs don't have the knowledge reagrding speed cameras, LA PCN appeal procedures, and double-declutching a 1949 Routemaster bus that we collectively do. If they did, there would be no need for sites such as this.
However, when entitled f*cknuggets start getting into histrionics about how the police are fraudulently refusing to accept their somewhat "challenged" interpretation of the data, and start trying to tell us what's what, I am usually reminded of the teachings of Dave.
As a scientist by education, I am personally offended (hasn't gotten me anywhere yet) by well-meaning idiots hell bent on disproving Darwin's "survival of the fittest" theory by helping posters who clearly neither want or deserve our help.
As has been pointed out already, the cherry on the already quite spectacular cake was the combo move of both accusing the site's owner of being a copper, with no basis whatsoever other than not being unconditionally supportive of the OP's flawed claims without having sight of the evidence, and then spamming the moderators by misusing the report button to accuse the site's owner of being a copper.
