Author Topic: Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years  (Read 2834 times)

0 Members and 143 Guests are viewing this topic.

Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years
« on: »
Unsure if this is the right place for this but I recently received a debt claim from German based eCollect on behalf of Sixt relating to a supposed traffic violation committed 4 years ago. They are expecting me to pay £302.92 within the next 5 days.


This is the first I’ve heard from Sixt or eCollect in regards to a fine/violation since renting the vehicle in Nov 2020. The letter states I now £300 up from the original £100 but I’ve had no emails or letters stating I committed an offence or owed money.

Where do I stand? Do I have grounds to kick back as this has popped up 4 years on from the date of rental

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years
« Reply #1 on: »
What was this "violation"?

Re: Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years
« Reply #2 on: »
The letter doesn’t state a specific offence.
It states “ invoice for traffic fine of the traffic violation committed by you”
I get an error message when trying to upload the letter otherwise it would be attached!


Re: Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years
« Reply #4 on: »
Thank you! Letter here:
https://ibb.co/mGBWgh6

Re: Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years
« Reply #5 on: »
does all the information, dates etc, quoted on the letter actually correspond with your hiring of the vehicle?
Quote from: andy_foster
Mick, you are a very, very bad man

Re: Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years
« Reply #6 on: »
The dates line up based on my bank statement. As does the reg and vehicle. I can’t remember exactly the vehicle but it was a 3.5t van.

Re: Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years
« Reply #7 on: »
ok was just checking it wasn't an erroneous charge.
Quote from: andy_foster
Mick, you are a very, very bad man

Re: Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years
« Reply #8 on: »
My view is that a debt collection company outside the UK has very little power to do anything about it, that's the usual line of approach when it's a foreign authority trying to collect debts here and vice versa when TfL's foreign agent are trying collect debts here. But others may have better advice.
Bus driving since 1973. My advice, if you have a PSV licence, destroy it when you get to 65 or you'll be forever in demand.

Re: Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years
« Reply #9 on: »
Is this a UK vehicle that you hired and drove in the EU?
I practice law in the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, London Tribunals, the First-tier tribunal for Scotland, and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal for Northern Ireland, but I am not a solicitor or a barrister. Notwithstanding this, I voluntarily apply the cab rank rule. I am a member of the Society of Professional McKenzie Friends, my membership number is FM193 and I abide by the SPMF service standards.

Quote from: 'Gumph' date='Thu, 19 Jan 2023 - 10:23'
cp8759 is, indeed, a Wizard of the First Order

Re: Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years
« Reply #10 on: »
No, it is a UK based vehicle driven only within the UK for the entirety of hire. This is the first time hearing of anything in relation to a violation committed whilst renting the vehicle 

Re: Alleged Traffic Violation: 1st letter after 4 years
« Reply #11 on: »
Why did you hire the van. A common issue is for moving and so the address you give to the hire firm is the old one.

I would ignore it - it's just a debt collector that no doubt relies on scaring people but has no power.

If it has any substance it is presumably about a PCN and they could have just charged your card at the time.