Author Topic: Single Justice Procedure notice issued  (Read 316 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

wdc251023

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« on: March 05, 2025, 12:17:20 pm »
Hi All,

I was issued with a Single Justice Procedure notice on 27/02/2025, with a deadline to make a plea by 27/03/2025.


The offence:
Exceed 40 mph speed limit in contravention of a Local Traffic Order - manned equipment.


The speed recorded was 66 mph, in an area which is described (40 mph and 50 mph), but was obviously 40 mph in this particular spot. The offence was in December. I can give the exact date if this is required.

I was the driver, and as such plan on pleading guilty. My question(s) are around the following;

- In terms of mitigation, I was unable to find a template letter to adapt. Is there one, or should this be natural/from the heart, as it were?

- Is the court likely to take my financial situation into account when considering the fine and overall punishment?

- In light of the above, what is the likely punishment in terms of fine, potential ban and number of points?

- Would requesting to attend court be deemed as wanting to take ownership for my actions, or is this more of an annoyance for the court?

This whole situation is extremely embarrassing for me. Even in the higher speed limit area, I am still speeding, so I accept that. The 'national' speed limit does not come into play until further along the road, so I have no excuse. My request for mitigation would be around the payment terms, and size of fine. I am the sole provider for a young family, and unable to make large payments per month. Is this what is meant by mitigation? As for why I committed the crime, I have no excuse, nor would I wish to make one. As mentioned, this is an embarrassing situation for me, and I would like to face the consequences as an example to my family. I made a mistake and will accept the punishment. The reason for looking at writing a letter, is to minimize this, and explain lessons have been learned and will continue to be learned (e.g. the impact of increased insurance costs next year as a result) without the burden of a hefty fine on top, which may have to be paid in one instalment.

I would be extremely grateful for any advice on what to include in my letter, whether it is correct to bring up the topic of finances, whether I should adapt a template letter (and where to find this), or I should just write what feels 'right'. Furthermore, if there is any rough guideline on what the punishment is likely to be, that would be greatly appreciated (0 points currently). I can see from the internet that the range is quite broad for 66 in a 40 zone:

Fine - Up to £1,000 (automatic 33% reduction if pleading guilty)
Points - 4-6
Fine - 7-56 day ban

This is quite hard to infer. In the worst case, I am looking at a fine of £770, 6 points and a 56 day ban. Is it likely to be this strong? I wouldn't wish to speculate, but I would assume the following:

- The fine will at least be double the fixed penalty of £100 (so £200 minimum)
- The points applied could only be 4
- I get the sense from research that the ban is discretionary, so could potentially be waived

Again, perhaps the above is wishful thinking, I am just trying to plan for all scenarios. As mentioned, I would certainly need a payment plan - is this something the court typically accommodates?

Thank you in advance for any help, advice or opinion and apologies if I have not provided enough/provided too much information. This is all very new, and quite worrying, for me.

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


jfollows

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
  • Karma: +1/-1
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Wilmslow, Cheshire
    • View Profile
Re: Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2025, 01:05:19 pm »
Disqualification or points, not both.

NewJudge

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
  • Karma: +24/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2025, 01:25:41 pm »
You have the sentencing guidelines wrong.

The suggested sentence for 66 in a 40mph limit is a ban of up to 56 days or six points, together with a fine of 1.5 weeks net income. This will be reduced by a third for a guilty plea, so one week’s net income. You will also pay  a “victim surcharge” of 40% of the fine and prosecution costs of round £90.

Work out what that means to you and when you respond to the SJPN make an offer to pay weekly or monthly at a rate you can afford.

As above, it is points or a ban, not both. The greater likelihood is six points rather than a ban. Your case is being heard by a  “Single Justice” (SJ). That is a single Magistrate sitting in an office with a legal advisor, dealing with matters “on papers” only. If a ban is to be considered, the SJ will adjourn your case to a hearing in the normal Magistrates’ Court and you will be asked to attend. You will not be banned in your absence without giving you an opportunity to attend court to explain what effect a ban will have.

wdc251023

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2025, 02:09:40 pm »
Thanks to those who have commented. That makes a lot of sense.

I did see that the maximum fine would be up to £1,000, and I thought it was a weeks net pay, not 1.5. In any case, does 'up to' £1,000 apply?

For example: if a week/1.5 weeks pay, minus 33%, plus 40% surcharge, plus £90 exceeds £1,000, is this capped at £1,000, or can it go over?

I am trying to work it out. A 40% surcharge would essentially be adding back the 33% reduction that had just been applied, plus £90. I am unsure of the exact details, but this could exceed £1,000. Is my understanding correct in that it is capped, or is this a fallacy?

In terms of the points, is there any maneuverability on this? E.g. 4-6. The replies suggest it would be fixed at 6, although the article I read presented a range.

With regards to the mitigation letter, I will take it that there is no set way to put this message across?

Thanks again in advance.

Southpaw82

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 785
  • Karma: +11/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2025, 02:34:31 pm »
You’re misunderstanding what a fine is. It is the financial penalty imposed for the offence. It does not include prosecution costs or the surcharge. The maximum fine is £1,000. The fine cannot exceed the maximum. The fine plus costs plus surcharge can.

666

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
  • Karma: +11/-8
    • View Profile
Re: Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« Reply #5 on: March 05, 2025, 02:39:11 pm »
Thanks to those who have commented. That makes a lot of sense.

I did see that the maximum fine would be up to £1,000, and I thought it was a weeks net pay, not 1.5. In any case, does 'up to' £1,000 apply?

For example: if a week/1.5 weeks pay, minus 33%, plus 40% surcharge, plus £90 exceeds £1,000, is this capped at £1,000, or can it go over?

I am trying to work it out. A 40% surcharge would essentially be adding back the 33% reduction that had just been applied, plus £90. I am unsure of the exact details, but this could exceed £1,000. Is my understanding correct in that it is capped, or is this a fallacy?

In terms of the points, is there any maneuverability on this? E.g. 4-6. The replies suggest it would be fixed at 6, although the article I read presented a range.

With regards to the mitigation letter, I will take it that there is no set way to put this message across?

Thanks again in advance.
The fine of 1.5 weeks pay is capped at £1,000 before the discount is applied, i.e. the maximum after discount is £667.

The surcharge (£267 in this case) is calculated on the discounted fine. It has a maximum, but it's £2,000.

As for points, the guideline is 6. Magistrates tend to follow the guidelines.

wdc251023

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2025, 10:56:09 am »
Thanks all for your responses.

I have been notified of the decision:

6 points

and

£1,000 fine - Minus 33% = £666

+ £90 costs

+ £266 surcharge

= £1,022.

This is more than I was expecting. From the comments, the 6 points were always going to be awarded, but seemed that there was discretion for the fine from £100-£1,000. I have been given the maximum. This may be common, and perhaps they don't tend to deviate from the maximum fine. The reason I thought there may be a discount applied was my financial situation. In any case, that has not happened and I cannot complain as I have been fined what they are permitted to fine me, due to my mistake.

I do have a further question if anyone would be so kind. In my letter of mitigation, I pleaded with the court to permit me to pay in instalments, as a lump sum is simply not possible. It wouldn't be possible at £500, it certainly isn't at £1,022.

Is it standard for the court to request it in a lump sum, and I have to speak with the Fines Officer as standard, or have they taken the decision to ask for it in full, even when considering my financial circumstances (which I disclosed)?

If it is the former, it does make me question what the use in providing my financials was, if they leave it to the Fines Officer anyway? If it is the latter, this is very concerning that they have asked for it in full, despite my financials.

In any case:

- How likely is it that the Fines Officer will allow me to pay in instalments? Citizens Advice were unable to comment on how likely it is. The internet suggests they MIGHT allow me. It is physically impossible for me to pay it in full - surely, by wanting to come to an agreement, they would prefer this than letting it reach bailiffs etc?

For the record, I am not asking for a minimal payment plan. I am suggesting a plan which would take roughly 16-18 months. (Appreciate they might wish to condense this to 12.) I just wanted to know how likely it is that they will work with me, and whether or not I should take anything from being asked to pay in full initially (Is this just procedure, or have they just dismissed my plea?).

Thanks as ever.

Southpaw82

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 785
  • Karma: +11/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2025, 11:11:25 am »
You won’t know until you ask. As a rule of thumb, fines are generally payable within 6 months by instalments but there’s no hard and fast rule.

NB: courts neither ask nor request, they order. It’s not optional.

666

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 349
  • Karma: +11/-8
    • View Profile
Re: Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2025, 11:49:15 am »

If it is the former, it does make me question what the use in providing my financials was, if they leave it to the Fines Officer anyway? If it is the latter, this is very concerning that they have asked for it in full, despite my financials.

You have only been asked to provide details of your income, as that is needed to determine the (income-related) fine.

That doesn't reflect your ability to pay.

NewJudge

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
  • Karma: +24/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2025, 12:33:45 pm »
Quote
…but seemed that there was discretion for the fine from £100-£1,000. I have been given the maximum.

The court can always exercise discretion but is bound to follow the sentencing guidelines unless there is a reason not to. Nobody on this thread, as far as I can see, gave you the impression that the fine might be as low as £100.

If you stated  your weekly income at £667 or more, the fine would be correct. That sum makes the guideline fine (1.5 weeks’ net income) £1,000, which is the maximum.  A third off that brings you back to £667.

Quote
Is it standard for the court to request it in a lump sum, and I have to speak with the Fines Officer as standard, or have they taken the decision to ask for it in full, even when considering my financial circumstances (which I disclosed)?

Different courts operate in different ways. The “Single Justice” procedure is designed to be slick and the hearing will have a large number of cases to process. Some areas may well leave the issue of payment plans for the defendant to sort out with the fines office. In any event, fines and costs are expected to be cleared within 12 months and unless you have exceptional outgoings they will expect you to pay £20pw o clear your total. That’s assuming your fine has been calculated correctly taking account of your income; if it hasn’t you need to contact the court to have your case reopened.

You should find the fines office is receptive to any reasonable proposal which meets this aim. There is no point in them setting payments which mean a defendant is bound to fail.

wdc251023

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2025, 12:53:40 pm »

If it is the former, it does make me question what the use in providing my financials was, if they leave it to the Fines Officer anyway? If it is the latter, this is very concerning that they have asked for it in full, despite my financials.

You have only been asked to provide details of your income, as that is needed to determine the (income-related) fine.

That doesn't reflect your ability to pay.

I was also asked to provide details of all of my outgoings. I assumed these would be considered when determining my fine and it would be based on income AND outgoings. Perhaps not.

Thank you for the advice to all who have replied. As it turns out, the Fines Office were extremely helpful. I am taking the minimum monthly payment allowed before it had to be referred to a Supervisor which would include completing an Income and Expenditure. This was just about affordable. It is slightly less than £20 p/w. All in all, an expensive lesson.

Thank you to everyone for your help on here during what you can appreciate is an extremely stressful time.

NewJudge

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 581
  • Karma: +24/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Single Justice Procedure notice issued
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2025, 01:30:40 pm »
Glad the fines office was helpful - they usually are as all they are interested in is securing payment. There's nothing in it for them to make it difficult or impossible for defendants to meet their payments.

If you had attended court in person at a normal Magistrates' Court hearing (you cannot attend a "Single Justice" hearing) you would have had the opportunity to agree a payment plan with the court before you left.


Quote
I assumed these would be considered when determining my fine and it would be based on income AND outgoings. Perhaps not.
Definitely not.

Only your income is used to calculate your fine. The guidelines quote the recommended fines in multiples of weekly income. Your outgoings and other financials are used to assess how quickly you should pay or, if a payment plan is agreed, how much the instalments should be.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2025, 01:33:26 pm by NewJudge »