I have removed the photo of the COFP (which is not a NIP), partly because it is utterly irrelevant, but mostly because it was unredacted.
As you would know if you had bothered to read the "***READ THIS FIRST***" sticky at the top of this forum, to successfully defend a speeding charge, you generally need more than simply a desire to avoid the consequences of being convicted, and in order to offer meaningful advice we need more information than that you want to avoid the points (and couldn't be bothered to read the READ THIS FIRST post, or redact your personal details from the COFP (or tell us that it was a COFP, rather than telling us it was a NIP)).
If the COFP had any defects, and if we were somehow able to ascertain that, that would not help, as a defective COFP (in not accepted within the suspended enforcement period) provides no defence to subsequent prosecution instigated after the expiration of the suspended enforcement period (DPP v Holden).
