Author Topic: Single Justice Procedure Notice  (Read 95 times)

0 Members and 113 Guests are viewing this topic.

Single Justice Procedure Notice
« on: »
Been charged for using a mobile phone and driving through red lights.

true story, I was driving through a serious RTC with a car overturned and full of police and ambulance crew on a junction. Manor House in north London.
I had passenger in my car at the back and was showing him the scene and pointing towards the right side of carriageway just at junction. As approached the junction a police officer stationed ahead signalled me to drive forward as the junction was getting clogged up. I listened to his order and did not take note of the traffic light being red which I have no recollection of the colour.
A few days latter i receive a NOIP from an officer that claims that i was using a phone to record the scene and that i drove through the red light. He claims he gave chase to my car and that i sped off which if he thinks i sped off and feels i made a mockery of him, which i think its the reason he went against me now and says that i was using a phone and went through red light.
i intend to plead not guilty but want to hear advise from here. or should i take a solicitor?

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: Single Justice Procedure Notice
« Reply #1 on: »
If you plead not guilty in response to the SJPN your case will be listed for trial. You should already have the evidence the police intend to rely on to convict you. I imagine that consists of a statement from the police officer involved.

Presumably you will disagree with that evidence so you will have to ask for the officer’s attendance at your trial to give evidence in person. You (or your solicitor) will have to cross-examine him to persuade the court that his evidence cannot be relied upon.

Cross-examination is a skill which even some lawyers have difficulty mastering.
« Last Edit: Today at 05:17:55 pm by NewJudge »

Re: Single Justice Procedure Notice
« Reply #2 on: »
Thanks for pre-emptively telling us that it is a true story. Saves wasting time assuming that you made it up.

However, if you had gone to the trouble of making something up, at least presumably the story would have contained some relevant details (albeit that they would have been untrue).

Where were you in relation to this traffic light when the occifer instructed you to move along?
I note that you do not explicitly deny using a phone.
I am responsible for the accuracy of the information I post, not your ability to comprehend it.

Re: Single Justice Procedure Notice
« Reply #3 on: »
What i meant as the true story, is at the time of the alleged offence i did not know anything as this all happened in the background and then was sent the alleged offence by post.
I did not use a phone and i was driving on the other side of the carriageway and the office showing me to drive on was further ahead.
I am sure that the officer has a body camera that i can ask for to show the true version.
The officer must have felt a laughing mock by chasing after my car and i did not notice and drove on. so i presume he made this up.
I will take a professional lawyer to fight this out in court if needed