Free Traffic Legal Advice

Some documents

Any particular question(s)?

Difficult as that place is on a hill and I’m on the borderline of speed limit rule to prosecute
I’m 35 on 30...

35 is not "on the borderline". It's the lowest speed at which enforcement action is taken
 

....so if that’s a ringer I don’t know.

Does that look like your vehicle? Is it somewhere it might have been at the relevant time? It was only just over a week ago.

Obviously want to resolve successfully

By "successfully" do you mean without you or anyone else receiving any penalty?

I am the registered keeper but the incident is not of my recollection photos don’t help to identify
Other driver is at work proof available

Proof of what? You're not being asked to prove where anybody was. You're being asked to provide the details of the person who was driving that vehicle at that time and location. You need to decide firstly whether the photographs actually show your vehicle and if they do, you need to set about establishing who was driving it. As above, if you can't you will have to convince a court that you could not. What steps have you taken so far to find out who was driving? If you simply turn up in court saying the incident is not of your recollection you will face conviction and six points.

I am wondering if the NIP stands if there is no signature printed or signed?
I will provide keepers details but it’s difficult to recollect when this happened.
Second named driver was at work in Finchley at that time.

Can the speeding fine be challenged with the speed being at the lower limit? What are the successful appeals that can be made for this low limit prosecution?

Any procedural issues to raise for them to drop it or known issues with the area ie camera sensitivity or poorly displayed signage?

Many thanks

Someone more qualified can comment on the signature, though I'm sure if it was an issue New Judge would have picked it up.

As for the 'lower limit', it's there precisely to remove any doubt: it's 10% over the limit, plus 2 mph.

The only way you can 'challenge' it is to ignore any offers from the police and to go to court. Since you haven't (so far) mentioned any possible defence, that would be a foolish decision, potentially costing you ten times as much.

Even if you do decide to challenge by eventually pleading not guilty you still need to name the driver or you commit a more serious offence than the driver did.

I will provide keepers details but it’s difficult to recollect when this happened.

As well as being the Registered Keeper, were you "the person keeping the vehicle" at the time? If so, you have a duty to provide the driver's details. If not you must provide any information that you have which will help identify the driver. So which is it? Either way you must comply with that request. You know when it happened as you've been given the details,

Second named driver was at work in Finchley at that time.

That would seem to make your task of identifying the driver somewhat easier.

Can the speeding fine be challenged with the speed being at the lower limit? What are the successful appeals that can be made for this low limit prosecution?

What lower limit? The limit is 30mph. The car was detected allegedly doing 35mph. 35 is more than 30. if the driver (whoever that was) wants to defend the charge on the basis that he or she was not speeding the court will have to be convinced that the car was travelling at no more than 30mph. However, unless you identify the driver the speeding issue is irrelevant. The police currently do not know who was driving so they cannot take action against anybody for that offence until you tell them.

I see no mileage in the lack of signature either on the NIP or the request for driver's details.

You seem to be intent on converting what will be the offer of a course for the driver into a far more serious outcome for you. If you fail to identify the driver you will face a charge which, if you are convicted, will see a hefty fine, six points and insurance grief for the following five years. So again, what efforts have you made to establish who was driving?

No cameras found on this street.
This offence was man handed (unseen)
From looking at the evidence I can see vehicle is on a fairly steep road caught at 35 and soon after at 32 as driver recognised vehicle was driving faster than anticipated down the hill
Road is called hill south.
I have a bilateral knee disability which clearly affects pressure applied to pedals down a hill and my reaction times due to pain and ADHD are little slower than the average person
I feel man handled speed fine here is quite unfair can I challenge this at all to my defence as having some disability adjustments?
Also it’s evident I did slow down immediately after being pulled faster down hill.
Surely they have chosen this spot to advantage themselves for giving fines and penalties?
Any other people shared useful helpful info about this specific location?
Driver is myself with both mental and physical conditions- all details have been now fully reflected on and gathered and I’m now considering whether to challenge this on man handed location unfairness and the fact I did slow down without knowledge of any cameras or man.
If there is a way to defend this I’d like to try as I would like to avoid points

I’ll post pictures