I'm not about to ask a judge to suck eggs, but it was the evidence that there was a temporary restriction correctly instituted that I required. In my experience Police Officers are rarely in any doubt, and I wouldn't take legal advice from one. The paperwork is interestingly geared to insisting you have done wrong and directing you down a path to admit it, rather than making an allegation and providing all the evidence to back that up. I recognise that had I contested the allegation the evidence would (may) have been presented, but again, you are dissuaded from normal Court activity by the variable penalties for different responses to the allegation. I went and found the relevant evidence, which is required at this early stage despite the fact that all I am presented with is an allegation. Just sometimes it turns out that some part of the process has not been correctly carried out, such as Clarke v CPS 2013 EWHC 366 (Admin). I am now satisfied that the order was in place, and this forum helped me with the missing link which was what that order was and how it may be found.