Author Topic: Smart Parking/DCB Legal LoC for incident in 2021  (Read 3641 times)

0 Members and 143 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Smart Parking/DCB Legal LoC for incident in 202
« Reply #15 on: »
Many thanks. I have not received anything from MCOL or via post just yet. Expect it this week.

One question, is it *likely* that signalling a desire to have the case heard will result in a hearing? Obviously, it’s understood that signalling this opens up the possibility.

In other reading I’ve done on the matter, mediation is often described as the eventual endpoint. Is the challenge to have it heard an attempt to put paid to their lack of specific documentation, I.e. to call their bluff? I’m just trying to understand the logic behind this strategy.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2025, 10:29:04 pm by bishbashbosh »

Re: Smart Parking/DCB Legal LoC for incident in 202
« Reply #16 on: »
One question, is it *likely* that signalling a desire to have the case heard will result in a hearing? Obviously, it’s understood that signalling this opens up the possibility.
It increases the chances of a hearing, which is one of the reasons it increases the chances of them discontinuing.

If you opt for an in-person hearing and they proceed, they'll have to spend the money to send someone to your local county court to argue their case. If you agree for the case to be heard on the papers, this suits the claimant, as their solicitors can simply submit written evidence and have the matter decided by a judge without them having to turn up.

In other reading I’ve done on the matter, mediation is often described as the eventual endpoint.
Mediation is only the endpoint if both parties agree to a settlement, which, given your position is that you owe nothing, is unlikely.


Re: Smart Parking/DCB Legal LoC for incident in 202
« Reply #17 on: »
One question, is it *likely* that signalling a desire to have the case heard will result in a hearing? Obviously, it’s understood that signalling this opens up the possibility.
It increases the chances of a hearing, which is one of the reasons it increases the chances of them discontinuing.

If you opt for an in-person hearing and they proceed, they'll have to spend the money to send someone to your local county court to argue their case. If you agree for the case to be heard on the papers, this suits the claimant, as their solicitors can simply submit written evidence and have the matter decided by a judge without them having to turn up.

In other reading I’ve done on the matter, mediation is often described as the eventual endpoint.
Mediation is only the endpoint if both parties agree to a settlement, which, given your position is that you owe nothing, is unlikely.

This makes sense. Thanks.

Re: Smart Parking/DCB Legal LoC for incident in 2021
« Reply #18 on: »
I will bet you £100 that this will NEVER reach a hearing. DCB Legal NEVER go as far as a hearing is the claim is defended. Their MO is to take this as far as allocation to your local county court and then discontinue just before they have to pay the £27 trial fee. They work on the assumption that you are low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree and can be intimidated into paying out of ignorance and fear. If you don't, then they move on to their next victim.
Never argue with stupid people. They will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience” - Mark Twain

Re: Smart Parking/DCB Legal LoC for incident in 2021
« Reply #19 on: »
I will bet you £100 that this will NEVER reach a hearing. DCB Legal NEVER go as far as a hearing is the claim is defended. Their MO is to take this as far as allocation to your local county court and then discontinue just before they have to pay the £27 trial fee. They work on the assumption that you are low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree and can be intimidated into paying out of ignorance and fear. If you don't, then they move on to their next victim.

I won’t take you up on that bet. This sounds about right from what I can see and have learned along the way. I do very much appreciate all your assistance here and, having not been through this exact scenario before, your confidence is reassuring against the niggles of doubt I sometimes have. Stay the course!
Like Like x 1 View List

Re: Smart Parking/DCB Legal LoC for incident in 2021
« Reply #20 on: »
Sorry to bump this if it’s unnecessary, but we haven’t heard anything from the Court by mail or otherwise since acknowledging service and lodging the defence. We did receive subsequent email acknowledgement from DCB Legal that they will be pursuing the claim.

I can’t see anything on the MCOL portal that gives any indication of what to do next, if anything. I want to be sure I’m not missing a step. Can anyone provide a bit of guidance?

Update: coincidentally, I’ve just learned that we received a voicemail from DCB Legal asking to make contact, presumably to try to intimidate and settle.
« Last Edit: January 29, 2026, 03:32:20 pm by bishbashbosh »

Re: Smart Parking/DCB Legal LoC for incident in 2021
« Reply #21 on: »
You're doing the right thing by keeping a regular eye on MCOL.

What does the case history say? There should be a list of dates e.g.

Acknowledgement of service recieved - 00/00/00
Defence received - 00/00/00

Re: Smart Parking/DCB Legal LoC for incident in 2021
« Reply #22 on: »
Quote
Your acknowledgment of service was received on 04/11/2025 at 08:05:24
Case Stay Lifted on 12/12/2025
DQ filed by claimant on 12/12/2025

That’s it. I assume something would be added when they’re after the filings etc. I also expect to receive documents by mail.

I’ll add that the defence is saved and held on the portal.
« Last Edit: January 29, 2026, 04:12:23 pm by bishbashbosh »