Author Topic: One Parking Solutions - ticket for returning within no return period  (Read 373 times)

0 Members and 35 Guests are viewing this topic.

Driver received a parking charge for returning within the no return time (24HR no return period).

Am i able to appeal this by flat out refusing to name the driver, given the ticket isn't a notice to keeper?

Physical copy of the PC was issued on windscreen - the images they've provided on the appeal site aren't consistent - one looks like the time / date has been superimposed after being taken as isn't the same format as the others. Although not sure this means anything...

Any advice appreciated

https://postimg.cc/gallery/jtKVfVv
« Last Edit: March 16, 2026, 08:47:24 pm by cferg »

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


Re: One Parking Solutions - ticket for returning within no return period
« Reply #1 on: »
Do you have (or can you easily acquire) any photos of the signage?

'No return within ____' clauses are generally difficult to enforce. Contracts are formed between parking companies and drivers - a vehicle cannot form a contract. Unless the parking company can demonstrate that the same driver parked on both occasions, it's difficult to see how they would demonstrate that a 'No return' term had been breached.

« Last Edit: March 16, 2026, 09:14:38 pm by cferg »

Is my best bet to not provide driver details & argue from that angle? how they're unable to enter into a 'contract' with a vehicle itself?

If it were me, I'd wait for the postal NtK before doing anything.

Give the parking operator the maximum chance to screw up.

They cannot prove that it was the same driver on both occasions and there is no legal requirement for any keeper to reveal any driver details.


The notice gives alternative breaches i.e. overstaying or returning within.

OP, only visitors are subject to these conditions subject to displaying 'a valid OPS visitor permit'.

Could this be as simple as a visitor permit with start time was clearly displayed in the windscreen and that 7.10am 15 March was more than 12 hours after the clearly indicated start time? I think you need to rule this out first.