I think your last day to appeal an IPC operator NtK is 21 days after the issue date. Your last day was 9th July. Meh! No biggie. Whatever you wrote in your appeal would have been rejected anyway.
Now they will say you are too late to appeal to the IAS. Meh! No biggie either as they would almost certainly have rejected an appeal too.
Then again, both the BPA and the IPC have now issued a joint Code of Practice (CoP) which, according to their blurb, is now effective and CPMUK have managed to breach section 8.1,2(e) which states:
The parking operator must ensure that a notice informs the recipient that if the recipient appeals within 28 days of receiving the parking charge, the right to pay at the rate applicable when the appeal was made must stand for a further 14 days from the date (subject to 8.1.2d) they receive notification that their appeal has been rejected.
The intellectually malnourished ex-clamper thugs at CPMUK have only given the keeper 21 days to appeal.
Again, at 8.4.1(a) which states:
Parking operators must provide a process for motorists to appeal against a Parking Charge (including unpaid parking tariff) in accordance with Annex C, which allows that the parking charge may be appealed within 28 days.
So, you can try a futile appeal to CPMUK and see what their response is. If they reject it because it is not within 21 days of the issue of the PCN then you can complain to their ATA, the IPC that they have breached the new CoP. Then again, the IPC is not likely to do anything as the are only looking out for their own members interests. You would, however, have some evidence to use in court should they be so stupid ast to take it that far that they have not abided by their own AOS which, whilst not regulatory, is a requirement for them to do so if they wish to be able to obtain keeper data in the first place.
Just do a generic, one size fits all, appeal from the keeper only with the following:
Re PCN number:
I dispute your 'parking charge', as the keeper of the vehicle. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client landowner.
There will be no admissions as to who was driving and no assumptions can be drawn. Since your PCN is a vague template, I require an explanation of the allegation and your evidence. You must include a close up actual photograph of the sign you contend was at the location on the material date as well as your images of the vehicle.
If the allegation concerns a payment machine or app, the data supplied in response to this appeal must include the record of payments made - showing partial VRNs - and an explanation of the reason for the PCN, because your Notice does not explain it.
If the allegation involves an alleged overstay of minutes, your evidence must include the actual grace period agreed by the landowner.
Show us any response when you receive it.