I'll come at this from a simpler perspective.
Firstly OP, I am not clear about your standing here.
Are you the registered keeper?
If so, did you receive the initial PCN and how? If a Notice to Driver left on the vehicle then what did the driver do? Did you as RK then receive a Notice to Keeper. What did you do?
I ask because on the face of it the demand for interest is an abuse of process and I don't need to know whether there were 2650, 5,650 or a million days since the PCN. IMO, we should try and get back to general legal principles which in this case align:
A claimant should bring their claim in a timely manner. IMO, this 6-year limit is misinterpreted. It is NOT a safety net, it's a maximum limit within which the principle of timeliness still applies.
Here the issues of timely manner and interest claim come into focus.
After determining that a parking charge was due then the creditor, now claimant, was obliged to pursue this in accordance with their CoP and statute or, if they knew the identity of the driver, expeditiously under contract law.
They waited 6 years, let's not dance on the head of a pin about 6 weeks, they waited 6 years. They now expect the court to support their claim to maximum interest because they couldn't be bothered to bring their claim in a timely manner.
Outrageous.
That limit is not there to enable creditors to wait 6 years so that they can maximise their claim and minimise the defendant's ability to recall facts.
But we need to know more. Did the RK use delaying tactics for 6 years, move house repeatedly, not update DVLA details etc. etc. or was the creditor simply idle?
OP, facts pl.
Thank you for this.
Yes, I am the registered keeper.
I really don't even remember the day in question but I know this was a car I used to drive...because it was so long ago, I can't even recall.
If they did send something 6 years ago, to be honest I doubt it, if they did I would have challenged this at the time as I worked in the area and would have been parked in said location because I was at work. I no longer work there and have not done so for a while but me saying anything other than I go to the area for work would be a lie as I really can't recall the facts.
This is a really good point. I assumed they had 6 years and that's that, but this is true. Why on earth did they wait this long to bring a claim...only to now request maximum interest.