Hello FTLA,
We would appreciate any help you could offer with regard to the follwoing case:
On the 11th November 2024, the driver parked at the end of Back Fields Lane beside the end of the terrace building wall. See location image on Google Street View below. The car was parked at the end of the terrace fairly level with the wall, and a little further along than the black Nissan in the Google Street View.
See Google Street View of the location:
https://www.instantstreetview.com/@51.462288,-2.588314,180h,-17.24p,1z,TVrGkp7AX8rAP6Cgnp1SXAThis wall is long enough for two cars to park along, and it was covered for a long time in graffiti (it has since be removed). There were two signs present, one partially covered in graffiti, the edges of graffiti overrunning the sign as you can verify - see attached photos. NOTE: this is not the car in question parked in ther photo - (it reads ‘Parking for Knightstone Staff and Contractors Only’, the other surrounded by graffiti (it reads Warning Private Land etc’ - see close up photo).
Additional replicas of these signs are placed on a number of surrounding parking spots, but not on all. The graffiti on that wall has only recently been removed, the ‘Parking for Knightstone etc’ sign remains, the other is presently absent, but without the graffiti, the sign is clearly visible, and not obscured. This is especially relevant for someone like the driver, who has a congenital visual impairment which compromises visual perception and recognition, but does not disallow a driving license.
On January 20th 2025, I, the registered keeper, received a parking charge notice - see attached redacted copy.
We would greatly appreciate any help you could offer us to appeal this parking charge. Please don’t hesitate to contact if there is any omission of information or further clarification required.
[ Guests cannot view attachments ]
