Not wanting to get into whether she has some mental health issues that result in her getting into so many scrapes with the law, and seemingly (not for the first time) burying her head in the sand and failing to respond to the S.172, but the article is a little odd.
It talks about the SJP being "secretive" and that "it is not known if Price was given the chance to argue against another driving ban." Surely the SJP doesn't dish out bans, presuming this is another totting ban. What it commonly said in these forums is that a potential ban (totting or otherwise) will trigger an in-person hearing in a court, to offer the chance of pleading exceptional hardship. Or maybe she just ignored all court letters as well, which results in the default action of SJP and totting ban.
